📢 **COMMUNITY PROPOSAL – Reward for Early Supporters**

[bassolana_darrel]

my total support! yessssssssss

[44kinja]

I support this proposal

[subrata_dhar]

i support this proposal .

[pando]

That’s a really interesting suggestion

[ili]

Sería maravilloso. Si proceda

[ivan_lopez_llorente]

Sería bueno pero repartido de forma equitativa por cantidad comprada en preventa

[Vasilis_Athanasiadis]

YES thats great !!!

[ss1]

I support this proposal.

[kanamenakagawa]

I support the suggestion

[Mattiazzi]

Eu apoio essa proposta

[Herminio_Coragem]

Dear WLFI pioneers,

I want to reiterate, in a very positive and determined way, that the distribution of 30% of the community pool to the first 85,000 supporters is not only desirable—it is inevitable.

Why is this division absolutely necessary?

1. Protection against concentration of power.

If this 30% is not divided among the original base, we risk seeing a monopoly by a minority, the opposite of the decentralization that inspired the WLFI.

A truly free network needs many active holders, not a few whales.

2. Compliance and regulatory trust.

Global authorities are increasingly watching the distribution of tokens. When issuance is excessively concentrated, suspicions of manipulation and unregistered securities arise. Ensuring that 85,000 wallets hold a significant stake demonstrates transparency, reduces the risk of sanctions, and reinforces the project’s legitimacy with regulators and exchanges.

3. Recognition of the community’s founders.

We completed KYC, invested without collateral, and propagated the WLFI vision.

Rewarding this trust cements a long-term bond and generates a positive network effect just before listing.

4. Strengthening the secondary market.

A broad base of committed holders reduces post-listing volatility and attracts new investors who value fair and liquid distribution.

A unique team, driven by excellence.

It is worth remembering that the team building the WLFI project has the support of President Donald Trump and his family, surrounded by the best advisors from around the world.

This is not just any team; has been formed by the brightest minds worldwide, always thinking about a real financial revolution.
This visionary leadership knows exactly what it is doing, and I deeply believe that WLFI is 100% decentralized, destined to create a better world, free from bank fees and unreasonable charges that the conventional financial system insists on charging.

Conclusion

Without this allocation, WLFI runs the risk of ceasing to be decentralized. On the contrary, by distributing 30% among the first 85,000 supporters, we guarantee fairness, regulatory solidity and sustainable growth. It is a logical, strategic and urgent step.

Let’s approve this proposal together and show the world that WLFI delivers on what it preaches:
financial freedom based on equity and real decentralization.

WLFI _ FairDecentralization
85K _ EarlySupporters CryptoTransparent

[richard_stange]

I think wlfi regarded early buyers, because we are wlfi, with 1 billion +/- tokens distributed on 75000+/- holders , very similar support hyperliquid, maybe WLFI broker records and propose historial airdrop to early buyers

[Kei]

I believe the allocation is fine, but this portion should be mandatorily locked and staked. This will ensure that early supporters do not sell off their holdings and can achieve stable returns.

[zullo1]

I support this proposal

[Nandra]

I support this proposal

[carteryang]

I think that’s possible coz the WLFI team is quite generous, question is how to distribute the community pool to the early buyers/supporters? Should it be based on share proportionality or equality division?

[ili]

Apoyo la propuesta que has presentado

[Esteban_Torras]

Thank you for this proposal—here’s why I strongly support it and a few ideas to enhance it:

1. Rewarding Risk & Loyalty:

• This proposal aligns incentives with those who believed in WLFI from the start. Rewarding based on individual purchase volume is fair, transparent, and motivates long-term holding ainvest.com+15governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+15governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+15.

2. Smart Token Allocation:

• If the proposal unlocks up to 5 billion tokens from the community fund, that leaves flexibility for future initiatives and governance without diluting early supporters coinpaper.com+14governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+14governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+14.

3. Scalable Structure:

• Consider setting different reward tiers based on thresholds. For example:
  • Owners of 1K–10K WLFI → +5% bonus
  • 10K–100K WLFI → +10% bonus
  • 100K+ WLFI → +15% bonus
• This structure strengthens alignment between holding size and commitment.

4. Complementary Staking Incentives:

• Pairing the reward with a staking component (e.g., locking tokens for 30 days to earn passive yield) would deepen engagement and liquidity support—leveraging community growth allocation funds medium.com+11governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+11governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+11.

5. Reward Transparency & Epoch-Based Release:

• Suggest breaking the reward into staggered unlocks (e.g., 33% at vote, 33% in 30 days, and 33% in 60 days). Provides clarity and prevents token dumping.

---

TL;DR:

• Yes, support it — it incentivizes loyalty and early adoption.
• Tiered bonuses + staking would increase momentum and retention.
• Scheduled, transparent distribution ensures stability and market confidence.

This proposal could become a textbook case of effective, community-first token governance. I highly recommend voting yes, with the enhancements above as a roadmap for deeper commitment and success.

[Kingscoin]

I supported this proposal