Thank you to the community for proposing models that reward WLFI holders.
I believe this shows how much we all care about building real value, not just short-term price action.
However, we must also consider regulatory safety.
Rewarding WLFI holders just for holding could classify the token as a security in many jurisdictions.
That’s why I previously proposed an alternative structure:
WLFI Locking = Participation Rights
-
Users lock WLFI to gain access to curated investment opportunities (proposed by the team or community).
-
Investments are made using USD1, not WLFI.
-
Profits may be used to burn WLFI, increasing long-term value.
This model:
-
Aligns with DeFi principles
-
Avoids passive income tied to WLFI
-
Respects legal frameworks
-
Still allows us to benefit from USD1 adoption
I want to clarify:
If the new proposal can be designed to avoid security classification (e.g., via WLFI locking or voting-based eligibility), I support it.
Let’s build something that can last — not just something that pumps.