Lmao, imagine believing you will ever know.
The Dao can be spoken of, but what is told is not the eternal Dao. Its truth can only be known by living it or by imagining living it.
ââââ
All the facts are out thereâthe 20% APY, the transfers, the blocks, etc.
Or Perhaps we will never get the âfactsâ you want which are related to wills whose truth nobody can verify or know except the owners who own it.
Can anyone explain to me what he did wrong? Did he sell tokens in excess of the 20% unlock? Did he sell tokens that were supposed to remain locked? If all he did was make a transaction that affected the price, I donât understand the justification for blacklisting him.
1 Like
Is he legally bonded that he cant sell his token? If yes why his token is unlocked? If not legally bonded why he cant sell his token? We need clarification from WLFI team that is he legally bonded or its just a promise that not being kept. Else, he just another whale who took profit causing a market crash only. Pls be logic and wait for WLFI teamâs feedback. Thanks.
1 Like
I guess this post is saying Justin not suppose to sell any of his token as he own alot of token that could crash the market⌠lol
Exactly, either his tokens were unlocked or they werenât 
To be very honest, seeing the WLFI team lock his account down is more concerning to me than large-but-legitimate transactions he may have made.
1 Like
Of course, he has the right to sell what he owns. It is his freedom, and we all should respect it. Likewise, the publicâs freedom to express their opinions must also be respectedâjust as you have defended.
The key point is to think in terms of a Win-Win versus Zero-Sum approach in this game.
If both sides act to create a Win-Win, everyone could benefit and the positive-sum game continues. But if one side acts only for self-interest, cooperation will collapse since the game shifts toward Zero-Sum.
In my view, the WLFI team needs to act with greater professionalism in addressing these issues. This is fundamentally a problem of poor management. The current situation would not have arisen if Justin had not become an advisor, if the official tweet had not incorrectly stated that the advisorsâ tokens were locked, or if the initial supply had been properly explained ahead of time.
That said, I still have cautious trust that the WLFI team has the will to create a Win-Win outcome for the world. To realize this, however, it will require wisdom and discipline to preserve trust and transform this into a genuine positive-sum game.
Hope we are playing a game that could Make All Great Again
â Reasons Why Investors Are Quite Sensitive About Justinâs selling
2 Likes
So his new tweet isnât really meaningful
Look at his new tweet.
He doesnât really sound convincing
I donât understand how people can defend this guy or the Team.
The community has been discussing for weeks whether they should sell or not.
If 10,000 people from the community had sold 5,000 tokens each,
that would only add up to 50,000,000 nowhere near the amount that was dumped
In the end, the Community isnt worth anything
Sun should go to jail
Agree to you as this is a fair statement, we will need WLFI team to share us the current situation which wallet supposed to be locked for Justin as the advisor of WLFI or both supposed to be locked. If both wallet supposed to be locked, why he is able to transfer. WLFI should take action if Justin violate the contract or hacking the lockbox platform. Not for us to jump to conclusion and immediately asked to give idea or proposal for compensation without understanding the actual scenario or situation.
anyone violating contracts or breaking the law in anyway must be dealt with! if Justin did not break the law and caught everyone for a sucker, well thereâs nothing we can do about that, personally the price drop has given me the opportunity to buy more WLFI for under $0.2