Very good ideaš i support it
This proposal has no vesting plan or otherwise any definition of unlocking
In short, this proposal will make the unlock effects only worse by delaying the inevitable but with even more tokens hitting the market
HARD NO
Yes, I agree to this proposal
I understand your concerns, but I think itās fair to raise this point. Imagine WLFI activates staking next month ā everyone with unlocked tokens can stake and earn, yet presale buyersā locked tokens sit idle, earning nothing. That effectively penalizes early supporters who helped fund the project from the start.
This proposal doesnāt change the vesting or unlock schedule ā it simply allows locked tokens to be productive while still locked, exactly as they would be if they were unlocked and staked. This isnāt about dumping more tokens onto the market; itās about parity and fairness for early backers, while keeping the same vesting controls in place.
Yes, I agree to this proposal
hope this gets approved. looks good for those looking for long term.
it makes more sense than just unlock it. I want something in return not just blocked assets in my portfolio.
I donāt know if the infrastructure and mechanics for this even exist yet, but in principle I like the idea ![]()
Yes, I agree with this proposal.
Je suis dāaccord, bonne idĆ©e
Sounds good , lets do it