Proposal: Use 100% of WLFI Treasury Liquidity Fees for Buyback & Burn

General
1160

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn

1161

For me, this proposal could support WLFI’s value by reducing supply, but allocating 100% to buyback & burn may risk long-term sustainability.

1164

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn

1165

For burn and but back.

1166

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

1167

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

1168

FOR - because this will make WLFI drive in the long term

1169
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1170

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

1171

FOR : Buyback & Burn

1172

Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

1174
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1175

Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

1176

For starters let’s do this. Buyback and burn

1177

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

1178

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

1179

FOR: but first you need to address the circulating supply FUD

WLFI team insisted that circulating supply on launch will be 20% from 25B of pre-sale tokens, so 5B + tokens for exchange liquidity = 5-8B total circulating supply.
Now on launch we see 24.8B in circulation instead.

Ecosystem tokens and ALT5 Sigma are not locked via a smart contract and because of that we have 24.8B circulating supply and bad price of the token on launch.

1 Like
1180

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

Go to the MOON..

1181

Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

1182

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn

2 Likes