Anyone who votes FOR is incredibly stupid.
The value of our tokens has plummutted, they unlocked only 20% of our tokens (5% of total supply) while the irculating supply is already 20%. Where does that come from? Now, they want to unlock an extra 5%. the sell pressure has been coming from the team.
we will lose everything.
Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
EN CONTRA: Mantener las fichas en la tesorería
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
For
I’ve considered it deeply, and I agree.
Keep tokens in treasury
. …………………………..
Why voting YES matters
• USD1 adoption grows via real usage & integrations
• WLFI becomes an active ecosystem, not a dormant governance token
• Stronger ecosystem = better long-term value perception
• Helps the team prove execution before bigger votes (unlocks / distributions)
• Especially for small holders, growth matters more than idle treasury tokens
If you vote NO
• Treasury WLFI stays unused
• USD1 growth slows
• WLFI risks being seen as inactive
• Strengthens the “WLFI does nothing yet” narrative
Important:
This proposal does NOT decide airdrops or future unlocks — those remain separate governance votes.
This vote is about building a strong foundation first.
For these reasons, I vote YES.
I’m voting FOR this proposal.
I believe this is a reasonable and strategic use of a limited portion of the unlocked treasury to support long-term ecosystem growth. USD1 is a core component of the WLFI vision, and its adoption, liquidity, and real-world integrations are essential for building lasting value.
While there may be short-term market concerns, allocating less than 5% of the unlocked treasury in a controlled manner is a measured risk. In my view, the greater risk at this stage would be underinvesting in growth and adoption.
I support this proposal with the expectation of transparency, clear execution, and regular reporting on how these resources are deployed.
AGAINST: Keep tokens in treasury
AGAINST: Keep tokens in treasury
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
AGAINST: keep tokens in the treasury.
Growth in USD1 should be more intrinsically linked to the $WLFI ecosystem to get broader community support. If the proposal were amended so that all fees generated by USD1 are used to buy back and burn $WLFI, I would be happy to change my vote to FOR.
Governance vote
Poll Options:
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
AGAINST do not even try 
AGAINST: Keep tokens in treasury
Keep tokens in treasury. Or unlock more WLFI.
목적: 잠금 해제된 $WLFI 국채 보유량의 5% 미만을 활용하여 USD1을 성장시키십시오.
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1