WLFI holders currently have no unlock timeline, no yield, no staking, and no real utility. Tokens have been locked for months with no way to use them in DeFi, as collateral, or to generate any return.
Distributing treasury WLFI as incentives in this context will likely create sell pressure and harm locked holders, while benefiting new partners with liquid tokens.
Supporting USD1 growth is important, but doing so without addressing WLFI holder utility, unlock visibility, or value capture is not acceptable.
WLFI holders currently have no unlock timeline, no yield, no staking, and no real utility. Tokens have been locked for months with no way to use them in DeFi, as collateral, or to generate any return.
Distributing treasury WLFI as incentives in this context will likely create sell pressure and harm locked holders, while benefiting new partners with liquid tokens.
Supporting USD1 growth is important, but doing so without addressing WLFI holder utility, unlock visibility, or value capture is not acceptable.
Prior to any governance vote, give us clarity about UNLOCKING, VESTING SCHEDULE for our remaining 80%!
You have ghosted the community about this matter for 5 months.
You know almost everyone is hurting since 10 October, and you’ve done nothing to help the community out.
Release another 20% of our tokens , or allow us to resell a portion of our tokens @ a discount , or allow us to use our locked $WLFI tokens as collateral for $USD1 loans.
We invested in World Liberty Financial. We are not asking for gifts, but you’ve made us beg for access to our liquidity.
Using a portion of the WLFI treasury as incentives to accelerate USD1 adoption is a smart, long-term decision focused on building real utility: not short-term price action.
USD1 adoption means:
• more integrations
• more real usage across CeFi and DeFi
• more partners
• increased economic activity across the entire WLFI ecosystem
The recent actions by the team- WLFI buybacks using USD1, major spot pairs on Binance, and clear progress toward a structured unlock schedule- demonstrate a strategic and well-timed approach to growth.
When USD1 grows, the WLFI ecosystem grows.
And when our products scale, the whole community benefits.
For these reasons, I am voting YES and fully support this direction.
USD1 has real momentum (~$3B TVL in ~6 months). That’s not theory, that’s adoption.
This proposal uses a small, capped slice of unlocked WLFI (<5%) to accelerate USD1 through real CeFi + DeFi partners and real use cases. That’s how you win a stablecoin race, not by sitting on treasury tokens and hoping.
WLFI stays the governance layer. USD1 grows the footprint.
More usage → more integrations → more value governed by WLFI.
I like that:
Incentives are targeted, not spray-and-pray
Partners + deployments are disclosed
Future spending still requires new votes
This is pressing the advantage while we have momentum, not over-committing.
If you believe in USD1 and want WLFI to govern a bigger, more valuable ecosystem, a YES vote makes sense.
Ya. It always says that, and then it’s not. It’s this first, and then actual vote I believe. I missed the last vote because of the lack of communication.
I’m voting YES on the WLFI → USD1 growth proposal