Proposal: Utilize Unlocked $WLFI Treasury Holdings to Support the Growth of USD1

AGAINST: Keep tokens in treasury

AGAINST: Keep tokens in treasury

AGAINST: Keep tokens in treasury & Unlock %80 WLFI

Agree: We initially purchased the tokens under the condition that we could not buy or sell them. Despite that condition, WLFI unlocked the tokens and made them available for sale. They have done more than what they promised, so I think we should make a choice that allows both of us to grow.

Against it just unlock the remaining 80% tokens we invested on WLFI tokens not on USD1

AGAINST! Keep tokens in treasury

FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1

Against: Until you release a roadmap for the remaining 80% unlock I’ll be using my vote to block whatever proposal benefits you.

5 Likes

FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1

Ok :eagle::index_pointing_up:

Sono d’accordo con la proposta.

Attendo votazioni

1 Like

More adoption, more fees, more buy back

1 Like

AGAINST - build WLFI treasury and unlock 80% for Publik sale (Price : 0.015$/0.05$)

1 Like

**】】反对:**将代币保留在国库中

1 Like

How does USD1 benefit WLFI? Are fees used to buyback tokens? If so, how much?

I don’t understand. How are you going to use it to leap to USD 1? So you’re saying that instead of burning the bought back WLFI tokens, you’ll provide them as compensation to users of the USD1 utilization project, right? In this sense, it’s very disappointing for the team. I am interested in the value of WLFI tokens increasing, not that I invested to become a slave fund for the company. And if we’re going to ignore all the governance proposals people make and only make proposals from the team, why hold a governance vote? Forcibly locking up funds is also a problem, but the proposed governance content is unclear, which is like telling us to be scammed without our eyes open.

4 Likes

And with the value of USD1 steadily increasing, wouldn’t the fact that the price of WLFI is falling mean that if you unlock the WLFI, it will fall even more?

To gain persuasiveness in the team’s words, it seems like the price of WLFI tokens needs to rise to be persuasive.

1 Like

AGAINST: Keep tokens in treasury

Please, Prioritize unlocking a portion for early supporters before Christmas and the New Year, as many are having a hard time coping financially.

1 Like

EN CONTRA: construir la tesorerĂ­a de WLFI y desbloquear el 80%

ABSTAIN: No preference

FOR: This is a convenient and common method to boost the main business ($USD1), and I have no reason to object to it.

Regarding global adoption: For USD1 to remain competitive against USDT and USDC, you need to provide a compelling reason for the world to accept it. I would like to invite all $WLFI holders, especially the decision-makers, to consider the DUKI (/dju:ki/) marketing proposal : The Decentralized Universal Kindness Initiative. It combines Duty, Universal Kindness, and Income to create a ‘cookie’ for everyone worldwide. The concept is simple: if you show care for the world, the world has a reason to reward you in return. I believe this market strategy could boost USD1 adoption in unimaginable ways.

All great deals begin with ‘kindness first’ and end with a win-win. I am currently building a few demos to illustrate these concepts and advocate for them to the Web3 world. I truly believe this is a great marketing idea. For those interested, here is the detailed proposal link.

1 Like