Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
Please explain why you previously purchased and supported a meaningless meme token.
I vote FOR (Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to support the growth of USD1).
Reasoning: USD1 is the flagship product of the WLFI ecosystem and one of the fastest-growing stablecoins (~$3B TVL in just six months). Using a small portion of already unlocked treasury tokens (<5%, ~$120M) for targeted incentives to top CeFi and DeFi partners will accelerate adoption, boost liquidity, integrations, and ultimately increase the utility and demand for $WLFI — benefiting all holders long-term.
This is a controlled, transparent move: all partners and distributions will be publicly disclosed, and any further treasury spending will require separate community votes. In the highly competitive stablecoin market, well-structured incentive programs are standard practice and often pay off many times over.
I support growing the ecosystem!
**FOR
**
benefit the early supporters
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
FOR: Proceed in according with the proposal
FOR:
Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
Against. Time to unlock the 80% first. There seems to be a lot of posts deleted. I wonder if they are against also.
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
AGAINST: Keep tokens in treasury
For.
I trust you guys. Go for it. ![]()
![]()
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
Also unlock equal amount of tokens for token holders or airdrop atleast smal quantity for current holders to avoid backlash
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
Do whatever you want. In return, Listen to your people.
Unlock even a portion of the 80%. You missed black friday. Will you miss Christmas and New Year too?
Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1.
Vote: NO. we dont need do it
In the long run, this seems beneficial to the project’s development, and as long as the interests of loyal investors are not harmed, no one will object. Furthermore, necessary transparency and interactivity must be maintained throughout the development of the USD1 and WLFL projects.
- 反对
Our core is WLFI, yours is USD1. You use WLFI to drive USD1 growth, but what about WLFI? What’s the point of relying on such minimal buybacks?
FOR: Utilize <5% of unlocked $WLFI treasury holdings to grow USD1
AGAINST: Keep tokens in treasury
Wow, really appreciate how WLFI holders get to subsidize USD1’s glow-up while our bags stay flat such visionary leadership really you guys are such geniuses!
Can’t wait for the next ‘strategic’ treasury sprinkle. =]