# Proposal: WLFI Governance Staking System **URL:** \ **Category:** General\ **Created:** [February 25, 2026, 5:52pm UTC](https://governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com/t/proposal-wlfi-governance-staking-system/52645 "2026-02-25T17:52:12Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 290
**Author:** ![VI3](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex034/user_avatar/governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com/vi3/32/321_2.png) [@VI3](https://governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com/u/VI3)\ **Post date:** [March 2, 2026, 12:55am UTC](https://governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com/t/proposal-wlfi-governance-staking-system/52645/290 "2026-03-02T00:55:03Z")
I agree 100%! I have proposed an amendment to do basically just that, consider commenting / liking it to get some light on it! > [@Staking Proposal Amendment… Proposal: Stake the locked tokens](https://governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com/t/staking-proposal-amendment-proposal-stake-the-locked-tokens/52778): > > I’m not sure the proper way to have this discussion, but this seems like a good start. The current staking proposal requires that tokens be staked to be eligible for governance voting, which I think is grand. To allow voting of the locked token supply it basically grants an exemption from this requirement to those tokens, allowing them to be voted despite not being staked. I would argue that a much more amicable approach (and one much more likely to appease those upset with the state of the lock… --- _[View the full topic](https://governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com/t/proposal-wlfi-governance-staking-system/52645)._