Proposal: WLFI Governance Staking System

*** AGAINST — I do not support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.**strong text

They reward voluntary lock-ups.
They do not reward imposed lock-ups.

Holders who choose to stake for 180 days receive rewards, incentives, and additional benefits.

But those who bought in the presale and have their tokens locked without any unlock date, without visibility, and without clear communication receive absolutely nothing.

Once again, presale buyers are being sidelined.

We have been locked since day one, with no choice, no yield, no compensation, and the team continues to ignore requests for clarification regarding the unlock timeline.

It is difficult to speak about long-term alignment when the earliest supporters of the project are left without answers or consideration.

15 Likes

Yes I support it 100%

WLFIStaking.Com Should Go Live

1 Like

FOR — I support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.

1 Like
  • AGAINST — I do not support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.
5 Likes

FOR — I support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.

2 Likes

ABSTAIN — early investors get nothing while new stakeholders cash in. Are we just supposed to sit and watch $WLFI go untouchable?

5 Likes

AGAINST — I do not support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.

2% staking? what a joke

I wouldn’t expect less from a p3do protector grifter hell-bound family to announce staking man when you all burn in hell and beg for my spit it will be a glorious day funny how you messed with people who believed in you 80% locked and 20B released for fiat you never believed in crypto you believed in enriching the trump brand and fiat holding company power positions. You are scum of the earth and may the Lord rebuke you

5 Likes

I support the implementation :four_leaf_clover:

1 Like

FOR I support & I want particpe the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System.

1 Like

Perfect timing for the proposal!

By the time CLARITY Act passes,

WLFI will be ready for the staking and rewards to be

properly functional :+1:.

2 Likes

Definitely in support of this. I like the idea of requiring staking for governance participation. Rather than exempting locked tokens from that requirement, I would argue that instead all locked tokens should be automatically staked.

3 Likes
  • FOR — I support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.
2 Likes

This is a very smart proposal indeed. As stated, it incentivizes more significant participation in governance, provides additional benefit for USD1 usage and creates structural demand pressure on competing stablecoins. Additionally and importantly, passage of and participation in this staking system by many, especially large holders, will provide price stability, an essential precursor allowing safe unlocking of the remaining 80% of presale tokens for those who do wish to unload some or all of their holdings.

1 Like
  • FOR — I support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.
2 Likes

FOR — I support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal :eagle::index_pointing_up::handshake:

1 Like
  • FOR — I support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.
1 Like

FOR — I support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.

1 Like
  • FOR — I support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.
1 Like

FOR — I support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.

1 Like

FOR — I support the implementation of the WLFI Governance Staking System as described in this proposal.

1 Like