No sé si te estafaron como a tantos otros . Aunque el equipo de WLFI podría aclarar esto. Los token oficiales solo se podían adquirir por la pagina oficial en la red principal Ethereum. Tipo de token ERC-20 eso pone en los Gold Paper. Y además nones lo mismo WLFI que LWFI y ahí es donde viene el problema y las dudas de muchos . En ese Gold Paper si pone Ethereum Binance y Base. Pero es legítimo? O una estafa muy bien hecha? Pongo las fotos de ambas.
I don’t know if you were scammed like so many others. Although the WLFI team could clarify this. The official tokens could only be purchased through the official website on the Ethereum mainnet. The ERC-20 token type is what the Gold Paper says. And WLFI and LWFI aren’t the same, and that’s where the problem and the doubts of many come from. That Gold Paper does say Ethereum, Binance, and Base. But is it legitimate? Or a very well-made scam? I’ll post photos of both.
Yes, indeed KYC verified, and then connected the wallet to purchase tokens from official website. So no doubt on validity of token, as token address was also not even typed but forwarded/redirected by website.
I have contacted $WLFI regarding this concern for solana token voting. I will get back with their answers when I hear from them.
Me alegro que tomase esa decisión , consultar a la dirección de Wlfi, nadie mejor que ellos podrá darle una respuesta exacta a su cuestión, le deseo la mejor de las suertes
I’m glad you made that decision, consult the management of Wlfi, no one better than them will be able to give you an exact answer to your question, I wish you the best of luck
Oh boy! This is a governance token of World liberty financial, whose USD1 is registered 1:1 US $ pegged. So no one is masked here including tokens holder who goes through kYC and those tokens can be reclaimed as stated in their agreement while purchasing tokens.
Also: $wlfi is Not yet related to trade or transfer plus they have a contact page in website. So let’s not be quick to judge.
instead of waiting on someone else why don’t you just do a tx history search in ur wallet and verify that it is:
0xdA5e1988097297dCdc1f90D4dFE7909e847CBeF6
Then you don’t rely on anyone or anything but yourself. The doubts regarding your purchase are legitimate. It’s not an accusation but it is what it is.
Now that you have involved the community please check so we can put this issue to rest !
many of the replies have been of this format, we posted the WLFI contract address on etherscan and multiple requests to look at his own wallet from the presale he thinks he did and examine the contract and show us the contract, he doesn’t need to expose his wallet. its also repeatedly pointed out that the tokens are not transferrable, therefor not tradable, but the only wlfi token on solana is an obvious scam coin and is trading.
All the data is on the blockchain and is final authority. I actually am not sure whaleofwlfi is a human anymore, i think its an aibot as it never actually responds to questions.
Tiene mucho sentido lo que dices. Por pare de algunos miembros de la comunidad se le facilitó información y los medios para que comprobase de forma certera sin realmente estaba invertido o no en WLFI, y continúa reincidiendo sobre lo mismo, Estoy contigo, dudo que sea una persona quien está detrás de este perfil .
What you say makes a lot of sense. By some members of the community, he was provided with information and the means to verify accurately if he was really invested or not in WLFI, and he continues to repeat the same thing, I am with you, I doubt that it is a person who is behind this profile.
Hello Guys, since when bots started creating accounts on WLFi. I was bit caught up in time.
I see what you shared is Ether contract address. But, like I already said the token I received were in SoL. So they don’t get verified with ether contact address.
! I don’t know how the WLFI team manage this in future, probably burning Ether tokens and accepting SOL tokens by creating a bridge. Or whatever!
Since you guys are not going to believe, that I received SOL during sales which also have other 37K wallets active. I let this matter rest for a moment.
But the gist of this post is to
ask $WLFI team to be transparent, regarding token address.
Ps: for a moment forget SOL tokens,
It is also unfortunate they didn’t even mention token address for Ether in website as well.(check it on Wlfi website if you can find it!)
You got scammed, you didn’t buy official wlfi on sol, this is not a thing. If you would please look at your wallet transaction, you will easily be able to see the contact address you interacted with. Please share that contract address here, we don’t care about your wallet address. We will help you understand…"
during the presale period there were multiple “worldlibertyfinancial” websites that had different .com/co/to domains that were copies. These were scam sites that looked very real.
p.s. I do agree, it would be better if the team simply publish the contract address on the website, but they didn’t and they probably will not.
Is the exact website through which I purchased.
Binance wallet. I verified many times and purchased through website numerous times not once. I am sure about it. No token address type, no click on fake website.
There is no mention in official website that they didn’t sell other tokens. Neither official website has the ether address.
I assume like me, who purchased ether went through the website link to particular purchase. And then acquired.
In worse case, if it was a scam from WLFI website itself let it be so! Just like you trust ether tokens purchased through official website (even though it doesn’t mention if’s address) I trust SOL tokens purchased from it.
Its a token address:
Cq16t8jRSxtQDcPyANothLYemBDkN6SVKjqSDZ99pump
Do your own research before investing.
There is no official mention of token address ether or sol in website. Neither there is information only Ether were sold.
I can’t further answer same questions! Only WLFI team can do it, when will solana token holders will be able to vote because snapshot doesn’t allow solana network.
Wlfi token is not tradable or transferable. Do you agree?
Their was a governance vote, anyone with an Ethereum wallet holding presale wlfi tokens or team wallets could vote, and only those wallets, and the governance vote was on governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com, the official site.
There was no option to connect your solana wallet, only Ethereum.
These facts are indisputable. Additionally…
You finally shared the solana contract, which is a pump.fun generated meme coin address that was funded by a Binance wallet with no money in it.
This token address shows up on twitter from pump and dump accounts trying to generate action based on confusion that this is the real token and it seems to be working. It is certainly possible this is a side thing someone of official team is doing to make the money for themselves I guess, it is quite well funded LP for such a scam. You will note that the wlfi white paper does not mention solana and that the token address has an odd number of tokens at a max supply of 1 billion while wllfi sold 25 billion in the presale.
Good luck to you, when wlfi starts trading on the ethereum Blockchain, that is wlfi, the token you are holding may go up or down or sideways, I hope you get rich and don’t loose all your money.
Also, that presale link you keep posting is not a valid link.
Why would you say official website that was used for sale, not valid! What’s valid website did you buy with?
During sale we had choice to put the assets in number of wallet including binance wallet.
Did you purchase through Binance wallet? I used that channel and purchased solana tokens by default. Probably they are in special agreement with Binance.
I don’t worry about their management of assets, and what they mention in Goldpaper(and they also metiion asset with Binance chain),
what I know is I purchased from official source, and was offered Solana.
That’s their thing, if it was official scam;
so let it be it. And how far $WLFI goes through scam.
But it shouldn’t be case! It’s technical limitation.
PS: I know crypto and there can be multiple tokens with same name, website looking similar. I exercised caution and multiple times with different network(avoiding network intersection) over periods of days purchased tokens with website only redirect link to binance wallet. I repeatedly said this!
***The limitation not being able to vote is because “Snapshot” only supports other networks except Solana, as Solana contract is not compatible yet with Snapshot. Therefore functionally technically, it is not yet possible to vote with Solana network with Snapshot (technology WLFI uses for voting now). Not because my token aren’t valid but because it is based on Solana.
Finally, to answer your question about transfer and trading, it could be their market study with just 1% or 1B tokens. That just my thought to be frank I can’t judge from WLFI team idea, and also provide or claim things I don’t know to be only truth. I am open to possibilities or other possible reality.
I do think $WLFI team should really be responsible and be transparent what’s going on. Offering Solana tokens but not mentioning about it and limiting voting rights. This is not what we opt for.