Did anyone that bought WLFI tokens during the pre-sales get personally notified by WLFI about the last proposal, either by mail, email, or some other means? Or did you simply come across the proposal by following X, or the website?
The reason for asking is because, according to my attorney, it is not OUR responsibility to have to follow this company on X or its website to get informed about a proposal. Since WLFI did a KYC for the original 87,000 early investors, THEY had the means AND responsibility to notify us. Even then, they couldn’t force us to vote.
In 2 years, when early investors get punished for not voting, there is going to be a huge class action lawsuit (the WLFI bylaws can’t stop it). WLFI is going to claim it was the investors job to keep checking X or the website for new proposals; that is NOT the case. And, more importantly, it is NOT in the original offerings when investors bought the tokens. My attorney wants to know if ANYONE got officially notified of the proposal, or any of the proposals.
When you are told either vote or have your tokens locked indefinitely you are being forced. It’s called coercion. How about you speak with an attorney before commenting about what you don’t know.
Lol, “not your job” How pathetic! If occasionally checking a website breaks your effort tolerance, good luck with life! You were never told your tokens would be locked if you didn’t vote. You were told that if the vesting schedule passes the vote, which it did, then you would have to elect to participate in it in order to unlock your tokens. And you were told that, if you stake your tokens, you must participate in two votes in your staking period to be eligible for your staking rewards. But none of that is what you describe. You are either misinformed or deliberately disingenuous. It isn’t my job to determine which.
Clearly, you have no idea how business works. Apparently, WLFI doesn’t either. And, we WERE told our tokens would be locked indefinitely if we didn’t vote. You’ll see.
If you did the KYC process, they have all the information they need to contact you. Your situation is the exact reason why there will be a massive lawsuit in two years when those who didn’t vote get punished.
I have voted on 1 or 2 proposals before, however not this last one as i was not aware until after the voting had closed.
DKawoon says in a previous post here, “Even if you didn’t cast your vote, you’re not punished in any way”. Is he correct or not?.
I do not understand that if you did not vote because you were not notified & unaware. Why would WLFI punish their early investors. It makes no sense & i do find it very strange.
This is directly from the proposal, word for word. “Holders who do not affirmatively accept this new vesting schedule will continue to have their tokens locked indefinitely” It couldn’t be clearer. If you didn’t vote, or vote yes, your tokens are locked INDEFINITELY. That is a punishment, and it will be grounds for a MAJOR lawsuit.
just to be more specific. . “Holders who do not affirmatively accept this new vesting schedule will continue to have their tokens locked indefinitely”
accepting new vesting is not VOTING itself.
You’re accepting new schedule by locking your tokens and signing the agreement.
If you didn’t vote but locked your tokens and signed the agreement , you won’t be punished in anyway. Don’t misconduct people pls.
Clearly, you did NOT read the entire proposal. So, why are you misleading people? If you did NOT vote to accept the proposal, you got your tokens locked indefinitely. The wording couldn’t be clearer.
How pathetic! If occasionally checking a website breaks your effort tolerance, good luck with life! You were never told your tokens would be locked if you didn’t vote. You were told that if the vesting schedule passes the vote, which it did, then you would have to elect to participate in it in order to unlock your tokens. And you were told that, if you stake your tokens, you must participate in two votes in your staking period to be eligible for your staking rewards. But none of that is what you describe. You are either misinformed or deliberately disingenuous. It isn’t my job to determine which.