Thank you for this proposal—here’s why I strongly support it and a few ideas to enhance it:
- Rewarding Risk & Loyalty:
- This proposal aligns incentives with those who believed in WLFI from the start. Rewarding based on individual purchase volume is fair, transparent, and motivates long-term holding ainvest.com+15governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+15governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+15.
- Smart Token Allocation:
- If the proposal unlocks up to 5 billion tokens from the community fund, that leaves flexibility for future initiatives and governance without diluting early supporters coinpaper.com+14governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+14governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+14.
- Scalable Structure:
- Consider setting different reward tiers based on thresholds. For example:
- Owners of 1K–10K WLFI → +5% bonus
- 10K–100K WLFI → +10% bonus
- 100K+ WLFI → +15% bonus
- This structure strengthens alignment between holding size and commitment.
- Complementary Staking Incentives:
- Pairing the reward with a staking component (e.g., locking tokens for 30 days to earn passive yield) would deepen engagement and liquidity support—leveraging community growth allocation funds medium.com+11governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+11governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com+11.
- Reward Transparency & Epoch-Based Release:
- Suggest breaking the reward into staggered unlocks (e.g., 33% at vote, 33% in 30 days, and 33% in 60 days). Provides clarity and prevents token dumping.
TL;DR:
Yes, support it — it incentivizes loyalty and early adoption.
Tiered bonuses + staking would increase momentum and retention.
Scheduled, transparent distribution ensures stability and market confidence.
This proposal could become a textbook case of effective, community-first token governance. I highly recommend voting yes, with the enhancements above as a roadmap for deeper commitment and success.