🟨 COMMUNITY PROPOSAL: Secure Our Public Identity with GOLD Badge on X (Twitter)

General
21

Thank you, Maga. Awesome.

1 Like
22

YES — Authorize $1,000/month from WLFI treasury to secure and maintain GOLD badge

2 Likes
23

Thank you, Zullo1. Appreciate the feedback.

2 Likes
24

@tespmoore maybe expand this reasoning out to include simplier notion of isolation from those willing to solicit scams by virtue of similar name constructs. This isn’t simply about credibility of the profile alone, rather, it should assist and serve along side other protections such as the current post closure notification being utilized by WFLI already and limit those currently being scammed by fake WLFI mimics. not all press is good press, especially in this instance.. and, all those buying fake tokens ultimately represents missed volume/market cap for WLFI once listed.

1 Like
25

YES — Authorize $1,000/month from WLFI treasury to secure and maintain GOLD badge

2 Likes
26

  1. It is NOT about credibility. The official account is credible with or without the Gold badge. I laid down the benefits on the proposal if ever, you will need to read it again.

  2. The closure notification is commendable initiative but does not stop from other account mimic-ing the website. I would say, it is not enough to do that.

  3. We are an ORGANIZATION. And having that gold badge verifies us as such, especially on Twitter.

I think we agree on the points you just need to express, yourself. Or we agree on the points but you didn’t read the proposal fully well.

In any case, thank you for your attention.

1 Like
27

YES — Authorize $1,000/month from WLFI treasury to secure and maintain GOLD badge.
There are many people who lack enough knowledge and are at risk of being scammed

3 Likes
28

Thank you, kind ser. :folded_hands:

1 Like
29

Yes, I’ve read with attention. my comments are to maybe refine and realize there is a wider topic here.. and, of course its about credibility, these notions simply go hand in hand. The gold tick is an extension of the core X verification process.. entity or otherwise.. Education of the wider market is synonymous with liberty. period.

1 Like
30

It’s about verification. WLFI is already credible (the gold tick will not make it more credible).
WLFI is trustworthy (ticker would not make it more, trustworthy). Because it is already is, at the current state.

Again, check the benefits. I enumerated it on the props.

Education on the wider market is a good point but not covered on this proposal. This is just specific to the golden tick discussion.

1 Like
31

you’re right. the gold tick wont make WLFI more creditable. its a market to help ascertain for the wider market if indeed this is the actual WLFI. this is my point. the volume of tokens out there obtaining volume detract from the WLFI credibility regardless of you wanting that to be the case. in my opinion and a member with far greater than 1m units as well its a honest comment. we are all here for the same reason…

2 Likes
32

YES — Authorize $1,000/month from WLFI treasury to secure and maintain GOLD badge

1 Like
33

Thank you friend for supporting the proposal l.

1 Like
34

YES — Authorize $1,000/month from WLFI treasury to secure and maintain GOLD badge.

1 Like
35

Thanks for ur infomation. My mistake.

1 Like
36

Yes, good idea. We need the be more “institutional”

1 Like
37

I liked the suggestion. Thanks

1 Like
38

:cross_mark: NO — Do not proceed at this time

A golden verification badge doesn’t mean anything; there are projects with golden verification badges that are scams.

Working diligently is more important; appearances are just decoration.

1 Like
40

For me, both are important. Once we start to onboard web2 users, having that extra layer really counts. Read the benefits part of you missed it.

Regardless, I appreciate your time for sharing your opinion. Your no is respected.

1 Like