Well for those of us who wont sell- we are always at risk. I can see you have no idea how things work. Its okay put it to vote and let the majority decide!
Long live the OG’s!
1 Like
How about distributing a Genesis NFT to each Genesis wallet?
For the wallets holding the NFT, the full 30% allocation could be divided into planned installments and distributed gradually in a transparent manner.
By making the NFTs tradable in USD1 or WLFI, this would increase the trading volume of these tokens. At the same time, providing scheduled allocations to NFT holders would help prevent a sharp decline in token price.
2 Likes
what happened to this initiative? is just a nice dream or could become reality? whales never vote this one
YES. Please God Yes. Allocating me included as probably the smallest presale buyer this many tokens would be life changing. And I would probably just stake them for the rest of my life anyway so don’t worry about selloffs. I bet a lot of us would stake. We believe we are part of something bigger than Trump bigger than BTC bigger than all of crypto. This could litterrally be the new financial system in the future.
3 Likes
it’s not an official voting. So, you’re right is just a nice dream of free money ))
This would make WLFI worthless if it were implemented.
And I believe the early supporters have already been rewarded, and it is already fair enough.
2 Likes
I understand your point that too much free distribution could hurt WLFI’s value.
But think about this:
If every wallet got 1M WLFI each, that would flood the market and surely harm the price — this is what we all want to avoid.
On the other hand, if the community decides on something modest, like a hybrid model (for example: each wallet gets a small base amount such as 100K WLFI and the rest is distributed proportionally to holdings), then the early supporters get recognition without massive dilution.
The goal is to reward the 85,000 early backers who took the risk when nobody else believed in WLFI, but in a way that keeps tokenomics strong and sustainable.
That’s why the ongoing vote matters — to find a fair balance between appreciation for early supporters and protecting WLFI’s long-term value.
1 Like
All this discussion is a joke 
Just imagine, how you explain to Justin Sun who put 300m USD in a presale that he donated these money to poor jeets? I mean seriously, imagine you put 300m in a presale and you got only 300k tokens due to “equal” and “fair” distribution, valued at 60k USD.
Stop dreaming and go buy dip, you are already 12x from initial contribution @all
1 Like
@Stekabus And if you were among the 85k early supporters eligible to receive the 30% distribution which is stipulated in the golden list paper anyway, How different would have been your tune on it !
2 Likes
MI voto al si por esta propuesta. WLFI to the moon
2 Likes
Vote: YES Because there’s only one way to prove that WLFI is truly decentralized.
3 Likes
Of course, YES, but life has never really smiled on me that way, and I have little faith it will be accepted
1 Like
Yes that sounds like good idea lfg
2 Likes
Yes. As a very small presale participant I vote yes. YES!!! And I will probably keep them staked anyway longterm. Currently I am slowly adding WLFI to my meager bag.
1 Like
完全赞同。应该给予早期支持者奖励，整个分配可以一次分配到位，但可以按照逐步解锁的方式进行，比如分为三年解锁，每半年解锁一次
‘
2 Likes
let’s do it , my vote is yes
2 Likes
YES to distribute 352,941 WLFI to every early supporter who helped build this ecosystem from the ground up!!
4 Likes
YES, I agree to distribute this allocation
1 Like
Are early investors the only ones who can invest? Please take care of those who entered the market later.
1 Like