Dear holder WLFI 20.70 USD

General
1

:loudspeaker: WLFI: Fair distribution of 30% is the decisive step towards real decentralization (WLFI 20.70 USD )

Dear WLFI holders,

If we want to see WLFI become one of the most important coins in the WORLD, we need to start with what distinguishes sustainable projects from those that fail: fair, transparent and responsibly executed decentralization.

WLFI promised to distribute 30% of the supply to the first 85,000 buyers, that is, all those who received the (47 USD1) in their wallets by purchasing at 0.015 USD or 0.05 USD. These participants were the true pioneers, who believed in the project at a stage when it was still just a promise.

:light_bulb: Why is this distribution essential?

:white_check_mark: Ensures WLFI’s credibility in the global financial ecosystem
:white_check_mark: Values ​​and rewards early supporters
:white_check_mark: Avoids token concentration in a few hands (something that sank projects like ICP, which lost trust due to poor supply management and more…)

A fair and auditable distribution of the 30% distributed among the 85,000 WLFI holders will be real proof of decentralization and that is what investors, partners and exchanges are looking for.

:bar_chart: Practical example:
If WLFI reaches Bitcoin’s market cap
I made a simple calculation, based on an estimated circulating supply of 100 billion tokens:

:green_circle: If WLFI reaches Bitcoin’s current market cap (2.07 trillion USD),
:chart_increasing: The price of each WLFI will be approximately (20.70 USD)

But this appreciation would only be sustainable with a strong community and broad distribution, never with concentration in specific wallets.

:brain: Decentralization is not just an idea, it is a strategy.

If WLFI wants to be taken seriously in the global market, especially by institutions and large investors, it needs to prove that it is different from the centralized projects that failed.

:speech_balloon: Now is the time to demand that the 30% promised to early buyers be distributed in a fair, transparent and traceable way.

Everyone who received the 47 USD1 must be included.

Decentralization starts now and it is our greatest asset.

SAY YES OR NO TO A FAIR DISTRIBUTION.

39 Likes
2

I don’t believe this is a fair distribution. There are many initial supporters behind the scene to push forward the project. I do believe the team is generous enough to distribute a small portion of the 30% to the pre-sale buyers.

14 Likes
3

I have to say only that we we should start with low supply for us to earn some money at the start and still be able to hold tokens without need to sale for governance, we could reach 117 dolars per token if we start sale with 10k per wallet and still earn more than we would with 30% unlock for example, the squeze strategy. But we will see what Devs have for us, still its one of the best and biggest crypto projest i have seen in a long time.

3 Likes
4

It would be nice to couple your proposal with an NFT 85K first partisant.

1 Like
5

Qué entiendes por una distribución justa, porque nada pones de equitativa, si la pretensión es una distribución a todos igual si tener en cuenta la inversión inicial, eso no es para mí una distribución justa, más bien injusta diría yo, das más al que menos invirtió y confió en el proyecto, igualando las carteras de quienes más confiaron e invirtieron más con las que menos confiaron e invirtieron menos. Esto no es justo ni es igualitario, es injusto . Comunismo en su máxima expresión
Si buscas justicia, igualdad y equidad promueve ese 30% del reparto en relación a las cantidades de las primeras inversiones .

What do you understand by a fair distribution, because you don’t put anything equitable, if the claim is a distribution to everyone the same if you take into account the initial investment, that is not a fair distribution for me, rather unfair I would say, you give more to those who invested the least and trusted the project, equalizing the portfolios of those who trusted the most and invested more with those who trusted the least and invested less. This is not fair or egalitarian, it is unfair. Communism at its best

If you are looking for justice, equality and equity, promote that 30% of the distribution in relation to the amounts of the first investments.

6

oui je suis d’accord avec cette proposition

1 Like