It has not happened in the history of crypto, that PAID FOR pre-sale tokens were subject to unlocks/vesting rules.
There is not a single pre-sale in the history of crypto where tokens PAID FOR and already distributed to buyers were subject to future unlocks/vesting rules. Furthermore, no unlocks/vesting rules were specified in the sales contract – so why is the team suddenly talking about “fair unlocks”? The ONLY fair unlock imaginable is that in 6-8 weeks from now, we have access to ALL OUR TOKENS, to do with as we please – trade, transfer, sell, stake, lend out, or burn!
If the “fair unlock” is about the 30% of tokens belonging to Early/Initial Supporters as defined in the Gold Paper, then please clarify this is in CLEAR WORDING THAT LEAVES NO ROOM FOR INTERPRETATION.
For example, in the recent PUMPFUN pre-sale, which sold out $600m worth in just 10 minutes, every pre-sale participant received 100% of the tokens they bought in said pre-sale. It should be no different for our $WLFI tokens!
Many community members are already disappointed by the delay – I am not, I trust the team. What I am concerned about is if our paid for tokens are subject to further restrictions – this would be INCREDIBLY BAD and a major stain on the project’s trust!
I hope the team will answer this in a tweet or in this thread. Please do not leave us in suspense and speculating for no reason any longer!