This is a rubbish idea. You should have bought earlier — not our problem. If you’re so eager to get your “fair share,” maybe just buy more $WLFI once it’s listed on exchanges. Frankly, it only looks like you want more tokens to sell later — and that’s disappointing.
You chose the price you bought at, and now you must own that decision. Presale phases don’t require retroactive transparency. You decided to jump in when tokens were running out — that’s on you. This proposal is essentially a refund dressed up as “fairness,” and that’s not justified.
Thanks for sharing your view, but let’s stick to the actual substance of the proposal.
I’m not asking for sympathy or “extra tokens to sell.” I’ve already bought at both $0.015 and $0.05 — and I’m still holding. This proposal isn’t about me personally it’s about recognizing that the final presale round came with higher risk and zero tradability, and yet no governance vote approved the price hike.
If the community disagrees, that’s completely fine, governance means putting it to a vote. But calling it “rubbish” without addressing the actual logic or facts doesn’t help the conversation move forward.
Totalmente en desacuerdo, las reglas eran claras , tuviste oportunidad de comprar a 0,015 y no compraste, una vez que subió a 0,05 viste la oportunidad de comprar, perfecto ese es tu precio. Igualmente podías no haber comprado y haberte quedado fuera, no fue así, compraste a 0,05 magnífico, tienes ventajas sobre los que están fuera y no confiaron en el proyecto ni a 0,015 ni tampoco en 0,05.
0,05 es tu precio, buscar cambio de reglas una vez aceptadas inicialmente en beneficio propio no es aceptar las reglas.
Totally disagree, the rules were clear, you had the opportunity to buy at 0.015 and you didn’t buy, once it went up to 0.05 you saw the opportunity to buy, perfect that’s your price. You could also not have bought and been left out, it wasn’t like that, you bought at 0.05 magnificent, you have advantages over those who are out and did not trust the project at 0.015 or 0.05.
0.05 is your price, seeking a change of rules once initially accepted for one’s own benefit is not accepting the rules.
It’s always like this: the subsequent pre-sale rounds are always more expensive.
And they’re more expensive because they’re less risky, thanks to the first-round buyers.
I’m in favor of this proposal for the time being.
I’m one that bought the presale at .05 but I’m not sure your proposal makes sense to anyone that bought in at .015. There’s another topic where someone proposed giving an additional allocation to all 85K presalers whether they bought in at .015 or .05. That is more equitable and logical and one that I think all presalers would support.
You would have to be an idiot to sell assets at a loss to invest in something that at that point was an even major gamble. Should of just walked into the cassino at put " the house on red "
Yes. Agree.
There has to be an arrangement for early buyers.
If that fund is created to reward early buyers, I am okay with them giving the rewards according to the buying line.
Nice try Ash. Just be happy that you were able to get in at the time & pricepoint you did. If you wanted WLFI at 0.015, you could have bought 3 months earlier when the real risktakers did.
Amendment to Proposal: Expand Bonus to All Presale Buyers — and Preserve WLFI Integrity
In light of WLFI’s latest announcement on tradability and new “paths” ahead, I propose that all verified WLFI presale participants (both $0.015 and $0.05) receive a 30% time-locked bonus, proportional to their purchase.
Why This Matters Now
Protect Early-Stage Loyalty
All presale buyers took risks when WLFI was not tradable, with limited visibility. A unified bonus strengthens holder cohesion and rewards real supporters — not speculators.
Avoid New Presale Fatigue
If WLFI opens another presale:
Much of the existing hype could fade, as early supporters feel sidelined.
WLFI will need to find entirely new buyers, which could stretch credibility and marketing.
Early backers may lose confidence, weakening community trust.
Prevent a Launch Dump
If WLFI goes live without rewarding presale holders:
Many early buyers may exit immediately out of uncertainty or perceived unfairness.
A rapid price drop could damage WLFI’s credibility during its most visible moment.
Better Than Dilution
Rewarding verified presale wallets keeps tokens within the same trusted cohort, rather than diluting value through new sales or unvetted airdrops.
Bonus Terms (Proposed)
30% bonus based on verified presale holdings
12-month lock (non-transferable)
To be distributed before or alongside CEX listings
This is the fairer, cleaner, and more community-aligned path forward — no dilution, no confusion, just solid loyalty-based growth.
Amendment to Proposal: Expand Bonus to All Presale Buyers — and Preserve WLFI Integrity
Why This Matters Now
Bonus Terms (Proposed)