You have to give a token to the person who bought it before President Trump’s party, because you’ve invested in uncertain situations
1 Like
If that’s the logic, I couldn’t buy bitcoin for 1k and bought it for 10k, so it’s like asking for the remaining 9k bitcoins
2 Likes
why another presale without community votes then?
1 Like
WLFI remains a voting token for up to two more months. Community vote must take place we demand our say.
1 Like
+1 on totally disagree for this proposal.
This is one of the successful topic that can trigger so many rejection, at least most of the community member that active have a sense of logic on trading… lol
Enjoy your day guys!!
1 Like
Yes. The spirit of $WLFI token is about transparency, governance and participation.
1 Like
I see you’re a fan of ChatGPT, or some other AI. Let me summarise in my own words. No. Why? because you agreed with the terms when you bought. Now you come here asking for a handout because you bought at a higher price? really? Do you understand the FCFS based IDO’s? You can ChatGPT all you want, the answer will always be no. How would this be fair to the people who trusted enough the project and bought at 0.015? aren’t they entitled to extra tokens for the extra trust? be glad you bought at .05, many didn’t.
2 Likes
People bought it from the pre-market after knowing it will be listed but those who bought it from the presale were gambling and no certain they would ever get anything
Don’t compare pre-market with presale, completely different.
4 Likes
Yes of course, I totally agree with this proposal. Let’s make it count
I respectfully disagree with this proposal. While I understand the intent to reward final-round participants, I believe it undermines the core principle of fairness that should guide presale dynamics.
Everyone had the same opportunity to buy at the $0.015 price. The early presale was open, public, and accessible. Those who joined later did so by choice, with full knowledge of the previous pricing. Retroactively giving a 30% bonus to later participants introduces an imbalance and penalizes those who acted early and took initial risks.
3 Likes
I didn’t say Ai was deciding anything. I just noticed the robot like speech, using multiple word for simple sentence, and basically saying nothing. See fairness on your part, in my opinion, would have been to say all people should receive a bonus, not just the category you’re part of. You can use AI all you want but that’s fairness, not what you’re proposing. I’m glad you understand FCFS, you sure don’t seem like it, otherwise you would have been happy you bought even in the second round, as i said last time, many people didn’t.
The first round lasted a few months if i’m not mistaken, when you had ample time to buy, so did many others, you didn’t, a lot of us did, that’s what commitment looks like. I and many other should be rewarded for the level of trust, and yet, you don’t see me here asking for more tokens, and yeah, in my opinion, that’s what a handout looks like.
2 Likes
I also bought at 0.05, but I do not agree with this proposal. It is everyone’s responsibility to arrive early or late to a project. Let us be consistent and mature.
2 Likes