Dear WLFI Team and Community,
Over the past weeks, our community has faced growing frustration and, in some cases, outright hostility. Much of this stems from what happened at launch: investors were told to expect 5B tokens in circulation, but instead 25B were released without any prior notice.
This decision has created:
- False expectations regarding token supply.
- Lost of trust due to lack of transparency and deviation from what had been communicated or voted on in governance and social channels.
- A wave of negativity (hate) across the community - members hoped for unrealistic prices (like $47 the first day), while others simply wanted clarity and honesty to holders.
We cannot ignore that trust is the foundation of long-term value. Without it, decentralization and growth are at risk.
Improve the governance system
Currently, proposals submitted to the governance forum are not votable - only team-initiated items make it to a vote. This limits decentralization and leaves many valuable community ideas unheard.
My suggestion is to add a governance tab within the mobile app where proposals can be submitted and filtered using fine-tuned OpenAI models.
- AI could remove spam or low-quality submissions, improve writing, and even highlight economy-related suggestions.
- This ensures that all meaningful proposals actually reach the community for voting.
Rebuilding trust through communication
A video message from the Trump family and leadership team to the community would have a significant impact.
- Address concerns openly.
- Share the long-term vision.
- Show that WLFI has real utility and that values its holders (use language everyone can understand).
Transparency is not weakness, it is strength.
Token supply & burns
After more than one day, it is unrealistic to simply “remove” tokens already in circulation, as that would trigger mass selling. However, controlled and meaningful burns can counteract dilution from future unlocks.
Each unlock event should be followed by a significant burn - not symbolic (47M is too small compared to 25B in circulation), but large enough to reinforce price stability and long-term value.
In addition to regular burns, we propose a major, extraordinary burn event.
- This event would be public, transparent, and broadcast live to the entire community. It might sound funny, but you already know the power of memes: we want a video of Barron Trump burning the a significant portion of the supply in the laptop, silencing all those who have criticized the Trump family and the project on the first hour.
- The burn should be large and meaningful to demonstrate the team’s commitment to WLFI’s long-term value.
- Its impact would not only be economic (real reduction of circulating supply), but also psychological, sending a clear message to critics: WLFI listens to its community and acts decisively to strengthen true holders.
This initiative would help restore trust among loyal holders and generate positive FOMO, leaving skeptics and detractors behind.
Long-term vision
With careful management of unlocks and meaningful burns, long-term holders could reasonably expect WLFI to reach $5-10 per token. This approach would reward community loyalty, encourage holding, and strengthen engagement and pride in the project.
Additionally, WLFI could offer staking programs that are more attractive and profitable than those of other projects, designed to be simple and accessible. Even users who are not crypto experts would feel confident investing, seeing WLFI as a trusted “bank” for their funds - safe, rewarding, and straightforward - while actively participating in the growth of the ecosystem.
Modernizing governance platform
It is time to move away from the current outdated forum, which feels clunky and not reflective of a modern project (your website is pure design quality, so I am sure you are using some framework for this). WLFI should implement a native, core governance platform directly within the app, where participation is seamless, transparent, and accessible to all holders.
Governance should operate as a hybrid system, combining:
- AI supervision to filter noise, highlight valuable proposals, and ensure quality and long-term vision.
- Team oversight to guide and support meaningful initiatives.
- Community input to maintain decentralization and empower holders.
All proposals should be votable and decentralized, but carefully and openly curated. This ensures that the community feels heard, decisions are transparent, and the project can grow in a structured yet genuinely decentralized way.
I hope that my ideas - although some may seem a bit wild, from my perspective they are extremely epic - can be of help to the team and community. I sincerely hope that, together, we can navigate through this annoying and silly storm. Shut the critics up now that they’ve sold.
Vendetta.
could be a good marketing imo