Hello great WLFI community,
what do you think?
WLFI Airdrop Proposal: 47,000 Tokens for 85,000 Loyal Holders and to Celebrate the Project’s Success..
161 Likes
Yes 
, it’s a good idea.
15 Likes
The airdrop plan could consider different risk phases: before Trump takes office, after he takes office, and after meme distribution.
6 Likes
I only have 1.2k tokens so that’s not possible to anyone 
4 Likes
It’s not about how much you put in because there was no maximum per wallet. However, this shouldn’t matter how much you put in as long as you participated in the project, you should get equal share.
Otherwise, 5 whales would buy all tokens and no need for others to participate.
When coins are distributed for bigger numbers of holders, the price will be more stable.
12 Likes
At the time of the second phase of the sale, token price was $0.05. Using that price, 47,000 tokens would be valued at $2,350. You are seriously asking for a handout of thousands of dollars for your “loyalty and patience”? How does patience even factor in when selling your tokens has been impossible? In what way have you been “loyal” to WLFI that would warrant such rewards? I saw many transactions go through for less than five bucks during the sale. Everybody who put in a few bucks has earned an ROI in the tens of thousands of percent for their “loyalty and patience”? These proposals are despicable, but fortunately they are also completely daft and stand exactly 0% chance of passing a vote.
8 Likes
I agree, yes airdrop WLFI 47,000 for early participants
6 Likes
I understand your point, but I think you’re framing it a bit unfairly. WLFI’s distribution and reward mechanisms aren’t about handouts — they’re about ensuring fairness and decentralization. Early participants (no matter how big or small) helped bootstrap the project and kept faith when liquidity and tradability weren’t available.
Patience does matter here, because everyone has been locked in for months with zero certainty. That’s a level of commitment and risk that deserves to be recognized. Loyalty isn’t measured just in dollars invested, but also in the willingness to hold through uncertainty without dumping the project.
As for proposals, remember they go through governance — if the community agrees, they pass; if not, they don’t. That’s the beauty of decentralization. Instead of dismissing them outright as “daft,” it might be more constructive to participate in the discussion and help shape proposals that are fairer and more sustainable.
9 Likes
What risk it was not an investment….
1 Like
What “commitment”? What “willingness to hold”? The token was and is locked, holding is the only option there is, you quite literally couldn’t “dump the project” if you wanted to. I think it is you who is framing things questionably. As for participating in the discussion, what do you think I’m doing? I do want to shape proposals that are both fair and sustainable, neither of which descriptors apply to proposals asking for free stuff handouts.
2 Likes
I have not even clue if I did KYC or not … it was long ago and can`t find anything in my emails … so :))
1 Like
There are so many other factors that will directly determine the success of this project. Arguably far more directly than Trump making office. What president has ever ventured into crypto, or even done any financial venture like this before. The risk was all the same and the finances people contributed were relevant to their own financial circumstances. Support is support.
5 Likes
I support your contribution. It’s very thoughtful. What intrigue me most is the statement, “support is support”; highly inspiring. Thanks
6 Likes
Do you not understand what an airdrop is?
2 Likes
There was already a reward of 47 USD1. Totally unrealistic
1 Like
Not a good idea. I saw some tweets that some one bought 1 WLFI per wallet and he/she owns about 20 wallets
1 Like
Yes , Sound Good!!! .
1 Like
Yes 
, I support the motion.
1 Like
They will not pass kyc i think
1 Like
They are real humans. they just tried to game the system at minimal cost…