Proposal: Use 100% of WLFI Treasury Liquidity Fees for Buyback & Burn

General
1617

Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

1618
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1619

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn

1620
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1621
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1622
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1623
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1624

Sure absolutely :100: burn is needed. So yes, burn with fees.

1625
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1626

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn

1627
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1628

Made my decision I voted FOR

1629

@WLFI_Team Just curious… what is the proposed buy-and-burn frequency? Are tokens continually purchased and burnt as fees come in, or is this mechanism batched out on a coarser interval?

1 Like
1630

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.

1631
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1632

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury, buyback and burn

1633

My Vote: FOR :white_check_mark:

I support this proposal as a long-term strategy to strengthen WLFI by creating sustainable scarcity through continuous buyback & burn. Reducing circulating supply directly aligns with the interests of long-term holders and can increase value over time.

That said, I believe it’s important to ensure that this program does not compromise operational growth. Treasury resources must remain sufficient to support upcoming liquidity pools, future investments, and ecosystem expansion.

As long as this balance is maintained — reinforcing scarcity while preserving operational capacity — I am fully in favor of this initiative.

3 Likes
1634
  • FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.
1635

For - I support this proposal

1636

FOR: Use all WLFI Treasury POL fees for buyback & burn.