FOR: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
Good suggestions!
3 Likes
I’m voting for burn 10billion token and vest 20%
2 Likes
FOR: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
3 Likes
Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
3 Likes
For:FOR: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees
1 Like
10 milyar ekosistem tokeninin yakılmasını onaylayın, %20 staking uygulayın, borç alıp vermeyi hızlandırın ve yakma mekanizmasını POL ve 1 USD ücretleriyle geliştirin.
2 Likes
I agree that there’s no reason to present these tokens as part of the circulating supply. However, since they are here now, the only way to make them disappear is through burning (at least 10B).
This is fair, in addition for ALT5, there was no justification for giving them before the public sale. As investors they should purchase tokens at the opening, like all other investors who didn’t participate and missed the presale. They inflating the circulating supply at launch, they diluted the initial token price. This “davantage" was just to give Eric access to the ALT5 board no one is fool.
4 Likes
FOR: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
4 Likes
- FOR: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
4 Likes
100 亿枚生态系统代币，WLFI蠢骗子，都没经过社区同一，私自解锁，玩尼玛的老鼠盘么？
2 Likes
FOR: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
3 Likes
Después de leer y leer pienso que la gestión de la dirección de WLFI en la salida del token fue acertada, tuvo que elegir el mal menor , y lo hizo rápidamente aumentando la liquidez de 10 billones más los 7,78 billones de ALT5, me explico:
- La dirección conocía la existencia de varias de ballenas entre los 85.000 seguidores iniciales que contaban con millones de tokens, si bien no podían conocer sus pretensiones con el 20% de liberación que le correspondería , aunque se intuía.
- Una vez salió el tokens y este subía estas ballenas comenzaron a desprenderse de sus tokens, la dirección aportó liquidez, y aunque esos tokens no se movieron de sus billeteras, podrían servir para aportar liquidez para retener el precio si subía en exceso para evitar que las carteras que ya estaban inundando el mercado se lucrasen a un precio desorbitado para luego dejarla caer el token, lo que arrastraría a muchos de los partidarios a vender también . Y pondría en jaque a este gran proyecto ( subida en vertical y caída en vertical, cuatro carteras enriquecidas y miles de arruinados y a un precio al que no se llegaría en años ).
- El aumento de liquidez fue rápidamente detectado por el mercado, y el precio empezó a descender, el mercado interpretó que esa liquidez era un afán de enriquecimiento de la dirección de WIFI y una traición a lo pactado, nada más lejos la realidad , pero así es el mercado, irracional.
- Situación actual, el precio sigue bajando, llegará un momento en el que se estabilice y volverá a retomar su senda alcista, y el máximo que alcanzó es un objetivo viable a corto o medio plazo. Lo
- Mejor de todo, las ballenas vendedoras ya no cuentan con su 20% y el valor subirá de forma natural y con garantías .
- El gran problema lo tenemos aún dentro porque estas ballenas cuentan con el 80% de sus tokens aún como el resto de los 85.000 partidarios, en la próxima liberación no estaría mal que la comunidad propusiéramos alguna fórmula que no repita lo de la salida del token a mercado, liberar un porcentaje menor a ballenas o retrasar su salida como a los directivos .
After reading and reading I think that the management of the WLFI management at the exit of the token was right, he had to choose the lesser evil, and he did it quickly increasing the liquidity of 10 billion plus the 7.78 billion of ALT5, let me explain:
The management knew the existence of several whales among the initial 85,000 followers who had millions of tokens, although they could not know their claims with the 20% release that would correspond to them, although it was intuited.
Once the tokens came out and it went up, these whales began to get rid of their tokens, the management provided liquidity, and although those tokens did not move from their wallets, they could serve to provide liquidity to retain the price if it rose excessively to prevent the portfolios that were already flooding the market from profiting at an exorbitant price and then dropping the token, which would drag many of the supporters to sell as well. And it would put this great project in check (vertical rise and vertical fall, four enriched portfolios and thousands of ruined and at a price that would not be reached in years).
The increase in liquidity was quickly detected by the market, and the price began to fall, the market interpreted that that liquidity was a desire to enrich the WIFI address and a betrayal of what was agreed, nothing further from reality, but that’s how the market is, irrational.
Current situation, the price continues to fall, there will come a time when it stabilises and will resume its upward path, and the maximum it reached is a viable objective in the short or medium term. It
Best of all, the selling whales no longer have their 20% and the value will rise naturally and with guarantees.
The big problem we still have inside because these whales have 80% of their tokens even like the rest of the 85,000 supporters, in the next release it would not be bad if the community proposed some formula that does not repeat the exit of the token to the market, release a lower percentage of whales or delay their exit like the managers.
3 Likes
Woting is a joke. No need to trick ourselves.
We vote for something else now, they are selling over us.
1 Like
FOR: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
7 Likes
FOR: I vote to lock 17B in circulation. That is not fair with holders, we holded because of 3B circulation.
5 Likes
FOR: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
7 Likes
* **FOR**: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
[
4 Likes
- FOR: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
2 Likes
-
FOR: Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
4 Likes
Approve the burn of 10 billion ecosystem tokens, implement 20% staking, accelerate borrow-and-lend, and enhance the burn mechanism with POL and USD1 fees.
4 Likes