In recent weeks, we’ve seen rising emotions and frustration-driven narratives. I believe it’s time to return to the core premise of WLFI.
WLFI was clearly communicated from the start as a governance token, not an investment instrument with guaranteed liquidity, price action, or profit timelines. Every pre-sale participant knowingly accepted this role.
Governance means:
long-term ecosystem building,
gradual rollout of products and use cases,
structured decision-making — not reactions driven by market emotions.
The project is actively evolving, and responsible governance requires aligned expectations, consistent communication, and clarity about what WLFI is — and what it was never meant to be.
This topic is meant to realign community expectations, not to escalate conflict.
How do you primarily view WLFI today?
- WLFI is a governance token focused on long-term ecosystem growth
- WLFI is a hybrid: governance first, value may follow over time
- WLFI should be treated as an investment token with stronger liquidity expectations
- I’m still undecided / learning more