I have a proposal for the WLFI team in order to be fair for all Early Belivers that bought WLFI at 0.05 $ instead of 0.015 $ because in the end it is not fair that some of us bought 3x more expansive than the others ! So my proposal is that WLFI team must Airdrop same amount of tokens at price of 0.015 $ !
13 Likes
It is what it is bud. Term of the sale was verified agreed and ratified. Also consider demand mechanics.
It’s not uunfair, it’s fair at the current market offer.
6 Likes
La cosa es que podrĂas aver comprado a 0,015 pero has comprado a 0,05 no es que no sea justo es que deberĂas haberlo hecho antes .
Hay gente que no ha podido comprar nada.
(Yo compré a 0,05) Y si me hubiese gustado comprar antes pero es lo que hay 
2 Likes
Respectfully, I understand your point — but I still believe fairness can go beyond just agreeing to terms.
Yes, we all accepted the terms at the time of purchase, and yes, price often reflects demand. But that doesn’t mean every outcome is automatically fair just because it followed “the rules.”
The early believers who bought at $0.05 did so with trust, without full knowledge that others would later get the same token for $0.015 — more than 3x cheaper. That creates a natural imbalance among early supporters, even if unintentionally.
This isn’t about complaining — it’s about suggesting a way to build deeper trust and ensure long-term community loyalty. Fairness isn’t always just about market mechanics — it’s also about how a project treats the people who showed up early and stayed committed.
6 Likes