Save the 85,000 visionary holders from poverty instead of enriching the "too RICH" by a fair distribution of 352,000WLFI to each early holder

General
1

Information is circulating that the “initial supporters” mentioned on the roadmap are a list of three companies:

-DT Marks DEFI LLC
-Axiom Management Group, LLC
-WC Digital Fi LLC

I remind you that these companies are already extremely wealthy; their investment in WLFI was only a small part of their multiple investments elsewhere.
Granting them 30% of the supply (30B tokens) would simply be adding honey to sugar, that is, making already wealthy people extremely wealthy at the expense of other poor people. Meanwhile, we, the supporters, from the launch at a price of 0.015 to 0.05, with our meager resources, have made a financial sacrifice by investing in a project with no end result or guarantee, simply by believing in Mr. Trump and his team, even before his election.
And in the end, we end up with a small gift of only 47USD1, perhaps even future major investors at the trading launch will have more profits than we, the shareholders of this project (85,000 holders).
In my opinion, this is contrary to the objectives of decentralization, which aims to eliminate the monopoly of enrichment, the banking system, etc.
We therefore propose that we review this distribution if it is proven that the 30% will be dedicated to the ultra-rich (DT Marks DEFI LLC- Axiom Management Group, LLC- WC Digital Fi LLC) to the detriment of the poor visionaries like us (85,000 holders), that this be reviewed and that we allocate at least 10 to 15% by airdrop to the 85,000 holders, failing which we are given all 30%.

This act will allow:

  • to resolve the inequity with respect to the project’s initial investors
  • to honor the 85,000 holders for their risk, their courage, and their faith in the WLFI project
  • to make the project viable and balanced over time by managing decentralized token holding
  • to make WLFI the crypto project that will have given financial freedom to more than 85,000 worthy people who believed in it, and all this to the credit of Mr. Trump, who will be able to boast about it
  • WLFI will thus be an example over time, a benchmark for social justice and equity, and will raise the cryptocurrency to where BITCOIN has not yet reached
    In conclusion, we propose that instead of further enriching companies with 30% of the tokens, to transfer them to us, the poor and brave 85,000 holders, or failing that, to transfer 10 to 15% of the supply to us. This will honor you and change the lives of thousands of people.

Thank you in advance for your positive votes. vote YES

18 Likes
2

Please comment and like after reading to boost the post

3 Likes
3

[quote=“DJIBRILBZG, post:1, topic:34528”]
“a benchmark for social justice and equity”
C’mon now…no offense, but I think you may a socialist!

2 Likes
4

zullo1***lol…very funny..yet not, do you agree or disagree with my overall point of view. Please let us know in the comments and by liking to boost this proposal

1 Like
5

Lanzó varias pregunta , no para que se contesten sino para que se reflexionen sobre ellas .
No os habéis preguntado porque no se dejó entrar a los estadounidenses de clase media o baja en esta joya?,
Para poder comprar estos tokens los residentes estadounidenses se les exigía ser “ INVERSOR CUALIFICADO, es decir tener más de 1 millones de dólares sin contar la vivienda habitual, y ganar 200.000 dólares anuales .?
( me atrevería a decir que ninguno de los que estamos aquí reunimos las exigencias de inversor cualificado)?

Sin embargo a los inversores extranjeros ( a nosotros ) solo se le exigió KYC , no os llama esto la atención ?, Reflexionen

Creéis de verdad que las finanzas de USA y su control se dejará en manos de inversores extranjeros, como somos todos los que estamos en esta comunidad

Personalmente pienso que somos muy afortunados por estar dentro de este proyecto y dentro de esta comunidad , porque , a mi humilde entender , esto no se crea para nosotros , pero pienso que tenemos una misión importantes en el lanzamiento del tokens , ( cada uno saque sus propias conclusiones sobre esto último)

La contrapartida de ser importantes en el lanzamiento es qué si conservamos nuestros tokens un tiempo considerable podremos mejorar el nuestra situación financiera hasta límites insospechados.

Terminada estas reflexiones, espero que nos ayude a toda la Comunidad. A ver más claro cuál es lugar y nuestro papel y la oportunidad que se nos brindó para mejorar nuestras economías familiar

En cuanto a la propuesta, siempre tendrá mi voto negativo, salvo que el reparto se establezca en relación a la inversión realizada por cada uno.

He asked several questions, not to be answered but to reflect on them.

Haven’t you wondered why middle or lower class Americans weren’t allowed in this jewel?,

In order to buy these tokens, US residents were required to be a "QUALIFIED INVESTOR, that is, to have more than 1 million dollars without counting the usual home, and earn 200,000 dollars annually.?

(I would dare to say that none of us here meet the demands of a qualified investor)?

However, foreign investors (us) were only required KYC, doesn’t this catch your attention?, he asked.

Do you really believe that US finances and its control will be left in the hands of foreign investors, as we are all in this community?

Personally I think we are very lucky to be within this project and within this community, because, in my humble understanding, this is not created for us, but I think we have an important mission in the launch of the tokens, (each one draws their own conclusions about the latter)

The counterpart of being important in the launch is that if we keep our tokens for a considerable time we can improve our financial situation to unsuspected limits.

After these reflections, I hope it will help the whole Community. Let’s see more clearly what is the place and our role and the opportunity we were given to improve our family economies

As for the proposal, it will always have my negative vote, unless the distribution is established in relation to the investment made by each one.

2 Likes
6

Elgrande1972****I agree with your very informative reasoning, thank you.
However, do you agree or disagree with my proposal and do you want it implemented? Please let me know by liking and commenting “yes, I agree.”

1 Like
7

En el último párrafo conteste a la propuesta .
In the last paragraph answer the proposal

8

Elgrande—In fact, the objective of this proposal is not on how to distribute to the 85,000 holders but to give a percentage of 10 to 30% to the 85,000 holders. The way to distribute them among us will be seen after having won the case by a vote.

2 Likes
9

I vote NO to the proposal. It just doesn’t sit well with my American Capitalistic spirit and all that President Trump stands for…It reeks of socialism.

2 Likes