YES - good idea make america great agaiinnn
6 Likes
Pourquoi ne pas bruler les 30%; ce qui permettrait de reduire l’offre
1 Like
VOTE YES 
Thanks to everyone who voted
5 Likes
Vote to distribute equal to all early 85000 supporter’s
6 Likes
Equal distribution seems like it would be unfair. Someone investing $100 would receive the same share as someone investing $10,000 or $50,000 — maybe a lower limit could be introduced for this. At the same time, equal allocation means fairness, transparency, and zero bias, which would create a leverage effect in increasing the value of this project.
4 Likes
Et pourtant ! Pratiquement Tout le monde ici a reçu la même somme « 47 usd1 »
5 Likes
Siii voto a favor de esta propuesta
4 Likes
Yes, I agree with this proposal. This will reward the first 85,000 holders, who can be considered shareholders who believed in a project when no one else did, by taking enormous risks.
Yes, yes, and yes.
8 Likes
I also strongly agree with this proposal
7 Likes
I VOTE YES to distribute 352,941 WLFI to every early supporter.
10 Likes
oui je vote pour cete proposition
5 Likes
Yes, I agree with this proposal. This will reward the first 85,000 holders, who can be considered shareholders who believed in a project when no one else did, by taking enormous risks.
9 Likes
YES to distribute 352,941 WLFI to every early supporter who helped build this ecosystem from the ground up.
12 Likes
Voto No a esta propuesta.. El reparto de tokens justo tiene que ser proporcional a la inversión realizada.
Los que menos confiaron en el proyecto no pueden ser premiados de forma igualitaria que quienes confiaron más en el proyecto y aportaron más capital para ponerlo en funcionamiento.
vote No to this proposal.. The fair distribution of tokens has to be proportional to the investment made.
Those who trusted the project the least cannot be rewarded equally than those who trusted the project more and contributed more capital to put it into operation.
2 Likes
Yes. I support this proposal. Distribution amount can be adjusted if it’s too high.
Would be fair to reward early supporters who participated in WLFI’s governance activities. not just hodlers..
Eligible distribution to those early supporters who have:-
- participating in platform decisions by submitting and reviewing governance proposals.
- Voting on snapshot
7 Likes
That’s 20 billion tokens the supply is only 20 billion lol
1 Like
yes pour cette distribution
1 Like
Yes, I support this motion.
3 Likes
Yes distribute equally
3 Likes
If there is to be a large scale disbursement, it should be based on the quantity of tokens in the wallet. If it is a flat disbursement per-wallet, then holders that bought smaller quantities in multiple wallets (which we definitely saw happening when watching the transactions in the early days of the sale) would receive a far greater reward than someone who bought the same amount of tokens but all in a single wallet. I can see no reason to disproportionately reward multiple-wallet holders over single-wallet holders. The only fair distribution would be based on quantity held, as is standard for snapshots and airdrops of tokens.
1 Like