Yes Good way to be strong
3 Likes
While I understand the concern, I believe this proposal is fair and necessary.
All 85,000 early supporters completed KYC, verified their identity, and contributed during the foundational phase â before any guarantee of price, liquidity, or token transferability.
This isnât just about how much someone bought â itâs about when and how they believed in the project.
Whether someone bought $5 or $500, they helped create the community that made WLFI possible.
Equal allocation removes bias, avoids manipulation, and treats all early verified supporters with fairness.
If we start calculating based on token quantity per wallet, it goes against the core value of decentralization â and may even reward whales more than sincere early adopters.
This Genesis Allocation rightly honors participation â not portfolio size.
13 Likes
There is so much wiggle room in words like âfairâ and âequalâ. People buying into multiple wallets would realistically only have bothered doing so in hopes of exploiting things like this. What benefit does their holding multiple wallets provide to the platform that justifies their being disproportionately rewarded over holders with a single wallet? If I bought 1000 tokens in one wallet and they bought 100 tokens in each of 10 wallets, they will receive a reward 10x greater than I do. Is that fair? Or equal? I suspect there are holders with many many many tiny wallets because I watched the transactions rolling through in the early days. There would be long strings of identical tiny transactions, for some exact same miniscule amount, repeated over and over and over. We talked about it in the forum at the time, wondering how it could possibly be worth the gas fees and what the upside could be. The only sensible conclusion was that they were gambling on being able to exploit per-wallet airdrops later on, and I felt at the time, as I was excited about supporting the project, like that was totally counter to the spirit of what we were doing. It chaffed me then and that hasnât changed. To me they were just sheisters setting up their racket, which basically amounts to stealing from honest supporters.
I found a screenshot I took during one of these discussions:
The screenshot only shows a brief instant, but you would see the exact same tiny number, in this case 176.54 WLFI, less than $3, roll by over and over and over, page after page. They were setting up for a grift and these âfair and equalâ disbursements reward them for it, and I wonât support it.
3 Likes
whether the distribution is based on coin holdings or given equally, I think itâs fairest if each person receives it to just one wallet. If someone gets it through multiple wallets, it could feel unfair to others.
I hear your frustration, but I respectfully disagree with the assumption that every small wallet was a âracket.â
This Genesis Allocation is not a speculative airdrop. Itâs a tribute to the 85,000 verified supporters who completed KYC and backed the project before it had any liquidity, price movement, or guarantees.
Key Point: If someone opened multiple wallets but completed full KYC on each, then they went through the same verification process every other supporter did â thereâs no anonymity or shortcut here.
No rules were broken. The platform never stated âper tokenâ or âper dollar spentâ would earn more.
Itâs not a staking reward â itâs a foundational thank-you to those who bet on the project early on.
Even the project team is rewarding contribution, not capital. Thatâs the core value of decentralized fairness.
If we start measuring contribution by token quantity, we reward the wealthy and punish those who genuinely supported within their means.
Thatâs not community â thatâs capitalism.
22 Likes
Every wallet eligible for this Genesis Allocation has to pass individual KYC re-screening via Sumsub â meaning each wallet is tied to a unique, verified identity.
This allocation isnât about how many tokens someone bought â itâs about how many unique, real people supported WLFI during the early phase.
If 3 people each bought $5 and completed KYC, why should they be valued less than 1 person who bought $500?
This is decentralization at work â valuing early belief, not just financial power.
Rewarding based on token quantity punishes smaller contributors and contradicts the founding vision of community-first decentralization.
15 Likes
Lets doit together and make it a better community
7 Likes
Vote: YES But prepare second KYC screening to filter out only real people out from those 85000 legends. And then proceed with community proposal and voting
4 Likes
When this wil happend @all ?
1 Like
I made no such claim. In fact you have misrepresented my comments everywhere you reference them. Iâd encourage you to go read it again.
1 Like
Hi, I received an email notification of your chat message about Genesis Allocation, for the 85k early holders. What is the allocation about? as I am among the very first day buyers of $WLFI when launched on 15th Oct 2024 & went through the mandatory KYC.
2 Likes
YES !! and thatâs super cool. 
Thank you! Iâm among the mandatory KYCâed early holders who bought in since the very first day it launched on 15th Oct 2024, without even knowing what might come out of $WLFI.
3 Likes
Yes I agree, decentralisation is key for a project to thrive and be fair for all participants.
3 Likes
Itâs not about the amount of $ invested in initially, itâs about the recognition for all the KYCâed very early 85,000 holders who participated into the project from the ground foundation, without no liquidity,transferability or any tangible guarantees. And mind you those who put in $5 /$300/$500 or $15k @ ground foundation, it might as well had been a fortune to them because that all they could afford and still invested in with no guarantee of return.
When will most human beings, see beyond themselves?!
4 Likes
How could that be? Each holder/WALLET had to be mandatorily screen KYCâed to be able to buy?
Vote YES!! Proceed with distributing 352,941 WLFI to the 85000 KYCâed early supporters who did participate at ground foundation.
9 Likes
My only experience was with the US KYC, which was quite robust. I have no idea what was involved elsewhere. But even if I donât know the mechanism, I also cannot believe that dozens of unaffiliated individuals would all execute near simultaneous buys for the exact same minuscule amount, much less that this would happen repeatedly.
1 Like
How do you explain to someone who put $15,000 into WLFI that someone else who only put in $10 will receive the same amount of tokens as a reward?
2 Likes
This Genesis reward is a thank you bonus, not an ROI calculator. It levels the field between early belief and raw capital.
If WLFI wants to be community-driven, it must reward commitment â not just size of the wallet. Otherwise, decentralization becomes just another version of ârich get richerâ.
17 Likes
Vote NO. This is nonesense. If we really want to be fair we need to distribute this proportionally to the $WLFI in each wallet.
8 Likes