USD1’s market share is growing explosively.
However, what tangible benefit does this bring to WLFI holders?
At present, the answer is none.
There is no binding document, no on-chain mechanism, and no enforceable code that links USD1’s success to value accrual for WLFI. What remains are only verbal narratives—empty echoes without obligation.
More critically, WLFI governance has been effectively neutralized.
Roughly the top 20 holders control over 51% of the total voting power, making governance outcomes predetermined. This concentration renders the system structurally incapable of representing the broader community. In practice, governance no longer governs.
If this project is to grow responsibly and distribute value fairly, governance must be fundamentally restructured.
Proposals
Option 1
Redistribute the locked initial investor allocation of 30 billion WLFI tokens evenly, eliminating excessive concentration at inception.
Option 2
Reform voting mechanics as follows:
Grant 1 vote per 100,000 WLFI per wallet
Impose a hard cap of 30 votes per wallet, regardless of total holdings
At least one of these measures must be implemented.
Only then can governance return to its intended purpose:
allowing a genuinely decentralized, non-specific majority to determine policy, ensure fair value distribution, and ultimately restore and enhance the intrinsic value of WLFI.
Without such reform, WLFI governance remains captured, symbolic, and functionally void—and USD1’s success will continue to benefit everyone except WLFI holders.
2 Likes