WGIP-01: Proposal for Annual Unlock of 1,000 WLFI per Wallet and Equal Distribution of the 30% Reserved in the Whitepaper to the 85,110 Early Buyers

General
1

WGIP-01: Proposal for Annual Unlock of 1,000 WLFI per Wallet and Equal Distribution of the 30% Reserved in the Whitepaper to the 85,110 Early Buyers

Proposer: Herminio Coragem
Date: July 16, 2025
Status: Awaiting Vote
Type: Economic Proposal / Distribution / Governance
Objective: Ensure the sustainable appreciation of the WLFI token and the generation of decentralized wealth among the original holders.

:down_right_arrow:Proposal Summary

This proposal aims to implement a limited annual unlock model of WLFI tokens per wallet, in addition to establishing an equal distribution rule for the remaining 30% of tokens among the 85,110 current holders. The goal is to maximize the individual value of the token, ensure market stability, and promote economic justice among the founding members of the ecosystem.

:play_button:Proposal Details

  1. Annual Unlock per Wallet.

Maximum unlock limit of 1,000 WLFI tokens per wallet, per year;
Applicable to all wallets recognized in the official holder snapshot;
Automatic unlock or with on-chain verification, auditable;
Aims to reduce selling pressure and preserve the asset’s scarcity in the secondary market.

  1. Fair Distribution of the Remaining 30%.

The remaining 30% of WLFI tokens will be distributed equally among the 85,110 current holders (or the exact number of eligible wallets);
No differentiation will be made based on the number of tokens held; each valid wallet will receive the same absolute amount;
The goal is to reward trust and early adoption in a fair, decentralized, and non-speculative manner.

Technical and Strategic Justification:
With only 100 million tokens unlocked, and reaching a market cap similar to Bitcoin, the individual value of the WLFI token could reach USD 13,000;
In this scenario, each participant with access to 1,000 tokens annually would have a potential income generation of USD 13 million per year, in a continuous and decentralized manner;
The annual unlock limit prevents value dilution, ensures predictability, and promotes sustainable growth;
Equitable distribution strengthens the sense of fairness and community cohesion, protecting against future centralization.

Expected Impacts:
:white_check_mark: Preservation of token value in the long term
:white_check_mark: Protection against sell-offs after unlocks
:white_check_mark: Equal participation in future wealth creation
:white_check_mark: Stimulation of strategic holding and active governance
:white_check_mark: Institutional attractiveness through a deflationary and stable model

Voting

Please indicate your vote below:

:green_square: Yes — I support the annual unlocking model of 1,000 tokens per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.
:red_square: No — I do not support this proposal as presented.
:yellow_square: Abstention

Final Comments

WLFI has a unique opportunity to create a truly innovative, sustainable, and fair wealth generation model. This proposal aims not only to protect the project’s future but also to ensure that every member of the community reaps the rewards of the value they helped build.

94 Likes
2

Yes — I support the annual unlocking model of 1,000 tokens per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.

28 Likes
3

Dear Herminio,

your idea is exactly the opposite of an anti-inflationary system. your proposal is only diluting the “richest’s” share. it is, frankly, stupid, and NOT FAIR.

27 Likes
4

Soooo, anyone who has 100,000 or more will need to live 100 years to unlock their tokens? Pass on that crazy idea.

31 Likes
7

Pass on that idea. Cant take 50 years to be able to sold all my balance.

10 Likes
8

No-I do not support this. It makes absolutely no sense. Sorry!

13 Likes
9

No — I do not support this proposal as presented.

13 Likes
10

Yes — I support the annual unlocking model of 1,000 tokens per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders

13 Likes
11

No I do not support this at all

12 Likes
12

10.000-36.000 token release anually would be much healthier. But one thing is for certain, locking and releasing no more than 25-30b tokens in total for market and trade is crucial to fight for price like 5-10$ per token.

11 Likes
13

Yes — I support the annual unlocking model of 1,000 tokens per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.

11 Likes
14

De antemano le digo que que no cuente con mi apoyo en esta propuesta , Volvemos a plantear cuestiones que benefician a los que menos inversión hicieron en perjuicio de los que más creyeron en el proyecto. ( siempre refiriéndome a pequeños inversores ) . La pretensión última de esta propuesta tiene como objetivo, mejorar la posición de quienes menos creyeron en el proyecto frente a los que más creyeron y más dinero depositaron .
Es decir se desbloquea una cantidad ridícula de tokens anuales ( lo que beneficia a los que menos tokens tiene , claro está ), y a cambio se reparte el 30% entre todos a las carteras en partes iguales .
Si hay que repartir algún % este debiera ser en relación a la inversión realizada, aquí hay un grupo que no es homogéneo porque no todos confiamos igualmente en el proyecto, ( si bien todos somos afortunado por estar aquí y tener alguna participación).
En cuanto a la cantidad ridícula que se quiere liberar de forma anual , a mi humilde entender , va contra el propio proyecto WLFI , y retrasaría su desarrollo por el escaso número de tokens que se pretende dejar en el mercado .
Por resumir, esta nueva propuesta incide en lo mismo que otras anteriores ( repartir el 30% de forma igualitaria, cuando hay hay inversores que entraron con 40 euros o menos y otros que entraron con 4000 o 5000 euros, parece más que lógico que el que menos creyó en el proyecto reciba menos que el que más creyó en el proyecto, porque cabe recordar que cuando aportamos dinero , el tokens estaba bloqueado y tenía valor cero y tampoco se separaba mucho más de el , de aquí que seamos tan pocos los que estamos en el proyecto).

No estaría mal valorar la fortuna que tuvimos de estar en un gran proyecto que hará historia, y dejemos de darle vueltas a cómo puedo mejorar mi posición con respecto a otros miembros del grupo , recibiendo más habiendo contribuido menos y haciendo que otros reciban menos habiendo contribuido más.

In advance I tell you not to have my support in this proposal, we again raise issues that benefit those who made the least investment to the detriment of those who believed the most in the project. (always referring to small investors). The ultimate intention of this proposal aims to improve the position of those who believed the least in the project compared to those who believed the most and deposited the most money.

That is, a ridiculous amount of annual tokens is unlocked (which benefits those who have the least tokens, of course), and in return 30% is distributed among all to the portfolios in equal parts.

If some % has to be distributed, this should be in relation to the investment made, here is a group that is not homogeneous because not all of us trust the project equally, (althouth we are all lucky to be here and have some participation).

As for the ridiculous amount that is wanted to be released annually, in my humble opinion, it goes against the WLFI project itself, and would delay its development due to the small number of tokens that are intended to be left on the market.

To summarize, this new proposal affects the same as previous ones (to distribute 30% equally, when there are investors who entered with 40 euros or less and others who entered with 4000 or 5000 euros, it seems more than logical that the one who least believed in the project receives less than the one who believed the most in the project, because it should be remembered that when we contributed money, the token was blocked and had zero value and it was not separated much more from it, hence there are so few of us who are in the project).

It would not be bad to value the fortune we had to be in a great project that will make history, and let’s stop thinking about how I can improve my position with respect to other members of the group, receiving more having contributed less and making others receive less having contributed more.

11 Likes
16

Yes I support the model of unlocking 1,000 tokens per wallet per year and distributing 30% fairly among the 85,000+ holders.:flexed_biceps::heart:

13 Likes
17

I agree to this proposal. This will bring many out of trenches

10 Likes
18

Yes — I support the annual unlocking model of 1,000 tokens per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.

11 Likes
19

:red_square: No — I do not support this proposal as presented.

11 Likes
20

:red_square: No — I do not support this proposal as presented.

7 Likes
21

No, ridiculous idea.
You must hold 1000 WLFI.

9 Likes
22

This proposal is interesting, we need an inheritance system to make sure investor have children and can be passed to the children to unlock the remaining token… might take hundred/thousands of years for big investors to unlock token. hahaa…
By the way, not agree on this proposal. Good entertainment though… lol

7 Likes
23

NO - 1000 wlfi in a year is inflationary. Project was meant to be deflationary

Would agree if you amend it to

40 % unlocked at tge and the remaining 60%
Linear mid term so 2 years, % of entire allocation each month

5 Likes