🧾 WGIP-01: Proposal for Progressive Unlocking and Fair Distribution of WLFI Tokens to Original Holders

General
1

:receipt: WGIP-01: Proposal for Progressive Unlocking and Fair Distribution of WLFI Tokens to Original Holders

Proposer: Herminio Coragem
Date: July 22, 2025
Status: Awaiting Vote
Type: Economic Proposal / Distribution / Governance

:bullseye: Objective

Ensure that WLFI tokens are unlocked in a fair, gradual, and transparent manner, respecting current holdings and promoting fairness, market stability, and unequivocal proof of the project’s decentralization to authorities, investors, and the global community.

:pushpin: Context and Current Problem

WLFI has 85,110 original holders, who collectively hold 25 billion tokens already acquired;
There is an uneven distribution: some wallets hold thousands, others millions;
Another 30 billion tokens are reserved for future distribution;
The lack of clarity in current unlocking processes creates uncertainty, selling pressure, and regulatory risk for an ecosystem that aims to be global and transparent.

:speech_balloon: Strategic Justification

The proposal demonstrates, technically and socially, that the WLFI is a decentralized and legitimate project, in accordance with the guidelines of:

(FATF), (SEC), (ESMA), (CVM), and other authorities;
World Economic Forum best practices on digital assets;
Technical recommendations for DAO governance and decentralized compliance mechanisms.

:brain: Technical and Philosophical Foundations

Equality in future distribution: all 85,110 holders will receive the same total amount (352,430 tokens) gradually;
Staggered unlocking: both previously acquired and new tokens will be released in a coordinated and incremental manner;
Auditable on-chain governance: the entire process is transparent, traceable, and open; Proof of decentralization: no central entity controls the rules, access, or movement of tokens.

:hourglass_not_done: How will the tokens be unlocked?

:small_blue_diamond: 1. Unlocking of the 25 billion already acquired:

Holders will have their acquired tokens unlocked proportionally over 10 years, in sync with the unlocking of new distributed tokens.

| Year | Cumulative % unlocked | Technical justification |
| 1 | 4% | Synchronized with the limit of 10,000 new tokens/year |
| 2 | 10% | Greater fluidity, no overhead |
| 3 | 18% | Beginning of the acceleration curve |
| 4 | 28% | Mature market |
| 5 | 40% | Consolidated community |
| 6 | 55% | Introduction of multilateral proposals |
| 7 | 70% | Expected stable liquidity |
| 8 | 85% | Preparation for token universalization |
| 9 | 95% | Final phase of operational freedom |
| 10 | 100% | Full unlocking, with full governance |

Example: Those who own 1,000,000 acquired tokens will only be able to move 40,000 in the first year, respecting the 4% limit.

:small_blue_diamond: 2. Distribution of the 30 billion equally among holders:

Each of the 85,110 wallets will receive 352,430 tokens over 10 years, with a progressive annual increase starting with 10,000 tokens in the first year:

| Year | Tokens per year | Cumulative total | % unlocked annually |
| 1 | 10,000 | 10,000 | 2.8% |
| 2 | 25,000 | 35,000 | 7.0% |
| 3 | 35,000 | 70,000 | 10.0% |
| 4 | 40,000 | 110,000 | 11.4% |
| 5 | 45,000 | 155,000 | 12.8% |
| 6 | 50,000 | 205,000 | 14.1% |
| 7 | 50,000 | 255,000 | 14.1% |
| 8 | 40,000 | 295,000 | 11.4% |
| 9 | 35,000 | 330,000 | 10.0% |
| 10 | 22,430 | 352,430 | 6.3% |

Values are adjusted to ensure a total of 352,430 tokens per wallet.

:globe_with_meridians: WLFI Decentralization Statement

“WLFI is a 100% decentralized project, where no entity or individual can control the distribution, movement, or governance of tokens. All decisions are made via public proposals (WGIP), openly voted on by on-chain wallet holders.”

This structure:
Does not constitute a security (passes the Howey Test);
Avoids concentration of power;
Meets transparency, sustainability, and traceability requirements;
Is self-regulated by the community itself and auditable by any international authority.

:light_bulb: Why is this the best proposal?

:white_check_mark: Real equality: all holders receive the same value, transparently;
:white_check_mark: Ethical and controlled unlocking: protects against volatility and abuse;
:white_check_mark: Proven decentralization: no elite control or central administrators;
:white_check_mark: Full transparency: permanent on-chain visibility;
:white_check_mark: International compliance: a model that can be presented to any regulator as a case of effective decentralization.

:globe_showing_europe_africa: A milestone for the New Global Economy

We are at a historic moment. The WLFI could be the first globally recognized community currency as a standard:

:man_police_officer: Free from state or corporate control.
Censorship-resistant.
Democratically governed.
Adapted to a new economic paradigm.

Please indicate your vote below:
:green_square: Yes — I support the annual token unlocking model per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.
:red_square: No — I do not support this proposal as presented.
:yellow_square: Abstain

:left_speech_bubble:By voting YES, you’re not just approving a proposal; you’re helping to legitimize Web3 before the world.

42 Likes
2

YES. I totally agree with this proposal.

6 Likes
3

@all yes I agree @Herminio_Coragem

4 Likes
4

Yes — I support the annual token unlocking model per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.

4 Likes
5

Yes — I support the annual token unlocking model per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.

5 Likes
6

Yes — I support the annual token unlocking model per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.

6 Likes
7

I hope this counts for the UAE and Aqua1 buyers, too since they are probably the biggest holders.

3 Likes
8

:green_square: Yes — I support the annual token unlocking model per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.

2 Likes
9

I don’t support any proposal that locks up Phase 1 or Phase 2 retail tokens. That would mean liquidity is never truly opened, blocking new, well-capitalized participants from entering. It might prop up the price in the short term, but in the long run it harms every WLFI holder. You have to let some investors cash out at 5× or 10× and sell their tokens to newcomers, who will then help build the ecosystem and push WLFI to a price that matches their own target return—perhaps another 5× or 10×—and repeat the cycle. Only this way can WLFI grow healthily.

If Wall Street isn’t allowed to scoop up tokens, why would it bother driving the price higher? Do you really think these 85,000 holders can pitch WLFI to more than 200 countries and convince hundreds of thousands of companies to hold it as a reserve asset? We urgently need stronger players to join in, hold enough tokens, and be motivated to push the project forward—this will benefit WLFI’s development in both speed and quality.

Please stop being so self-righteous—seriously!

7 Likes
10

I still disagree with restrictive unlocking of tokens, though admittedly this schedule is less absurd. I also continue to oppose disbursements on a per-wallet basis without consideration for the wallets contents. It pointlessly multiplies rewards for buyers who put small amounts in multiple wallets rather than large amounts in a single wallet. Any disbursement to token holders should be done based on the number of tokens in their wallet(s).

4 Likes
11

Yes — I support the annual token unlocking model per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders

2 Likes
12

Yes — I support the annual token unlocking model per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.

2 Likes
13

Yes, thats sounds great.

2 Likes
14

Yes- I totally concord with this unbeatable proposal, for decentralization to be effective as it supposed there must be fair distribution and transparency.

After all, no promising of ROI from the WLFI team when the individual of us was buying the token but luckily we found ourselves in this amazing avenue of opportunity.

Let this sink again, the WLFI team never promised ROI if you buy the WLFI token so distribution of 352,430 tokens per wallet to all the initial 85,110 holders is fair and transparent enough.

Additionally, the vesting should remain like that to avoid the initial holders lost their voting power.

I think the team should go ahead with this proposal.

Once again, i salute the WLFI team for their transparency and this idea of equitable wealth distribution.

4 Likes
15

I totally understand the opposition of few members of the community to this proposal but from my understanding of this project the blessed trump family wants to build that is impower people across the world financially sort of gift to humanity in form of cryptor and also have their legacy stamped in time.we as community should unite to sustain this project to ensure its success.

2 Likes
16

Yes — I support the annual token unlocking model per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.

4 Likes
17

I agree, let’s rip the band-aid off and see who the real WLFI diamond hand supporters are.

18

Yes — I support the annual token unlocking model per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.

1 Like
19

I’m a market buyer. Early supporters continue to be self-righteous and self-serving. If you’re serious about fairness, please offer a proposal that everyone can agree on.

20

1- NO, I am not Agree until $WLFI Make a Genuine RE-ALLOCATIOIN TOKENS $WLFI in my new Wallet with KYC claiming 2 month Ago by Email and they did not even Reply when and How to do it., this is not Ethical Deal Buy Tokens and the Companies do not distribute it, those Tokens was PAID already working as donkey everyday to give a better future to my family and what they are doing is none ethical practices…. First Do the RE-Allocation with KYC claimed already and after we will happy to Vote yes.

1 Like