I agree. I don’t support this. It makes absolutely no sense. Sorry!
2 Likes
No — I do not support this proposal as presented.
2 Likes
Dear all,
After careful analysis and consultation with two mathematical experts, I have concluded that the concerns raised in the previous proposal are legitimate. These experts corroborated the arguments of those who voted against it, and, out of respect for the community and the principle of decentralization we advocate, I have decided to amend the original proposal. I am pleased to share a new proposal that is more realistic, fair, and directly addresses all the concerns raised in the comments. This version aims to fully protect the WLFI token and reinforce its decentralized nature.
New Proposal: https://governance.worldlibertyfinancial.com/t/wgip-01-proposal-for-progressive-unlocking-and-fair-distribution-of-wlfi-tokens-to-original-holders/35216
I invite everyone to read carefully and reflect on the new content. The participation of each member is essential for us to build solid, transparent, and fair governance for all involved. I remain available for clarification and constructive discussions.
Sincerely,
Herminio Coragem
4 Likes
Yes,
I support the annual unlocking model of 1,000 tokens per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.
3 Likes
No I do not support this at all
1 Like
I’m a little bit confused by this proposal. Is this pertaining to all of the WLFI tokens purchased in presale?
If so, it seems a little extreme that I may have to wait 35 years to unlock all of my tokens. What about those who have purchased significantly more?
I like the idea of an equitable release, but this seems like it may be a bridge too far.
3 Likes
Sí — Apoyo el modelo de desbloqueo anual de 1000 tokens por billetera y la distribución equitativa del 30 % entre los 85 110 titulares
2 Likes
No — I do not support this proposal
1 Like
Yes — I support the annual unlocking model of 1,000 tokens per wallet and the equitable distribution of 30% among the 85,110 holders.
[/quote]
2 Likes
No — I do not support this proposal as presented.
2 Likes
I do not know if this proposal is the most appropriate, could have vesting but not annual, I do not agree with this proposal, for more decentralization
1 Like
This is good proposal, i support
2 Likes
No — I do not support this proposal as presented.
Releasing 1000 tokens per year would be unfair. A wallet holding 1000 tokens could use 100% of its allocation at once, while a wallet with 50,000 tokens would need 50 years to fully unlock its tokens. For a wallet with 100,000 tokens, it would take 100 years. I don’t think this approach is appropriate. Instead, a percentage-based limit per wallet could be considered and discussed.
1 Like
The unlocking schedule is far too restrictive. It would result in even modest investments taking generations to unlock. Impractical. I also do not support a large scale disbursement on a per-wallet basis with no consideration for its contents. I can think of no good reason to give a reward 10x greater to someone that bought 100 tokens in each of 10 wallets than to someone who bought 1000 tokens in one wallet. If there is to be a disbursement I believe it should be based on the contents of the wallet. Hard pass.
1 Like
YES i support this proposal
2 Likes