If all investors aren’t receiving the same unlock allocation at launch (unlike the flat unlock used in the $USD1 airdrop), then we propose the Progressive Fair Launch Unlock Schedule as a transparent and equitable solution.
This model ensures:
Equal opportunity for all WLFI holders Unlocks based on tiered holdings — not insider access No early dumping from whales Healthy, stable circulating supply at launch .
The goal?
A launch that’s as decentralized as the movement behind it. Proposed structure Image:
Great, whales will be prevented from dumping large amounts at launch. This controlled release will help stabilize the market and build early confidence in the project.
The media will likely highlight the successful launch, drawing even more attention—similar to how Bitcoin went from $0.01 to $120,000.
This kind of momentum and visibility could help position the project as one of the top two or three biggest crypto projects in the world.
So, you believe that someone who risked everything by buying in October, BEFORE Trump got re-elected, should be treated the same as someone who bought in March? AFTER Trumps re-election and attempt? No effen way is that fair. Unlock should be by month purchased. It would be an insult to let everyone sell at the same time.
I fully support this progressive unlock schedule.
It’s a fair model that protects small holders, prevents whale dumps, and promotes long-term value.
This is exactly the kind of decentralization and transparency the WLFI ecosystem needs. Let’s build this right.
I get the impression that part of the community still has nothing clear that we have been touched with the magic wand and we have a value that has no precedent comparable.
Selling early would be a mistake comparable to not having entered the pre-sale. Those who sell will hardly be able to enter at lower prices at the time of sale. Those who have experience in the stock market and/or crypto know what I mean.
The whales are not going to sell Gold at the price of copper, they know what they have in their hands, they are going to try to keep the tokens of the weak hands that do not know the value of what they have in their hands.
I remind you that American investors in order to enter this value needed to be qualified investors (earn more than 200,000 euros per year and have assets of 1,000,000 euros without against the usual home), perhaps now you will see the value of these tokens.
Getting into approaches to see who is the one who has to sell gold at copper price before is not a good business
Me da la impresión que parte de la comunidad aún no tiene nada claro que hemos sido tocado con la varita mágica y poseemos un valor que no tiene precedente comparable.
Vender temprano sería un error comparable con no haber entrado en la preventa. Quienes vendan difícilmente podrán entrar a precios inferiores al momento de la venta. Quienes tienen experiencia en bolsa y/o en cripto sabe a lo que me refiero.
Las ballenas no van a vender Oro a precio de cobre, saben lo que tiene entre manos, van a intentar quedarse con los tokens de las manos débiles que desconocen el valor de lo que tiene en sus manos.
Os recuerdo que los inversores americanos para poder entrar en este valor necesitaban ser inversores cualificados ( ganar más de 200.000 euros anuales y tener un patrimonio de 1.000.000 de euros sin contra la vivienda habitual ), quizás ahora veréis el valor que tiene estos tokens .
Entrar en planteamientos de ver quien es el que tiene que vender oro a precio de cobre antes no es un buen negocio
